From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/7] MIPS: sync-r4k: Rework based on x86 tsc_sync
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:54:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612-mips-clks-v2-5-a57e6f49f3db@flygoat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612-mips-clks-v2-0-a57e6f49f3db@flygoat.com>
The original sync-r4k did a good job on reducing jitter by determine
the "next time value", but it has a limitation that when synchronization
being performed too many times due to high core count or CPU hotplug,
the timewrap on CPU0 will become unaccpetable.
Rework the mechanism based on latest x86 tsc_sync. (It seems like
the original implementation is based on tsc_sync at that time,
so it's just a refresh.) To improve overall performance.
Tesed on Loongson64, Boston, QEMU.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/r4k-timer.h | 5 -
arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 2 -
arch/mips/kernel/sync-r4k.c | 281 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/r4k-timer.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/r4k-timer.h
index 6e7361629348..432e61dd5204 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/r4k-timer.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/r4k-timer.h
@@ -12,15 +12,10 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SYNC_R4K
-extern void synchronise_count_master(int cpu);
extern void synchronise_count_slave(int cpu);
#else
-static inline void synchronise_count_master(int cpu)
-{
-}
-
static inline void synchronise_count_slave(int cpu)
{
}
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
index 0b53d35a116e..0362fc5df7b0 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
@@ -462,8 +462,6 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
return -EIO;
}
- synchronise_count_master(cpu);
-
/* Wait for CPU to finish startup & mark itself online before return */
wait_for_completion(&cpu_running);
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/sync-r4k.c b/arch/mips/kernel/sync-r4k.c
index abdd7aaa3311..39156592582e 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/sync-r4k.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/sync-r4k.c
@@ -2,121 +2,244 @@
/*
* Count register synchronisation.
*
- * All CPUs will have their count registers synchronised to the CPU0 next time
- * value. This can cause a small timewarp for CPU0. All other CPU's should
- * not have done anything significant (but they may have had interrupts
- * enabled briefly - prom_smp_finish() should not be responsible for enabling
- * interrupts...)
+ * Derived from arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c
+ * Copyright (C) 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/nmi.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/r4k-timer.h>
-#include <linux/atomic.h>
-#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
+#include <asm/time.h>
-static unsigned int initcount = 0;
-static atomic_t count_count_start = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static atomic_t count_count_stop = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-
-#define COUNTON 100
-#define NR_LOOPS 3
-
-void synchronise_count_master(int cpu)
-{
- int i;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- pr_info("Synchronize counters for CPU %u: ", cpu);
+#define COUNTON 100
+#define NR_LOOPS 3
+#define LOOP_TIMEOUT 20
- local_irq_save(flags);
+/*
+ * Entry/exit counters that make sure that both CPUs
+ * run the measurement code at once:
+ */
+static atomic_t start_count;
+static atomic_t stop_count;
+static atomic_t test_runs;
- /*
- * We loop a few times to get a primed instruction cache,
- * then the last pass is more or less synchronised and
- * the master and slaves each set their cycle counters to a known
- * value all at once. This reduces the chance of having random offsets
- * between the processors, and guarantees that the maximum
- * delay between the cycle counters is never bigger than
- * the latency of information-passing (cachelines) between
- * two CPUs.
- */
+/*
+ * We use a raw spinlock in this exceptional case, because
+ * we want to have the fastest, inlined, non-debug version
+ * of a critical section, to be able to prove counter time-warps:
+ */
+static arch_spinlock_t sync_lock = __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
- /* slaves loop on '!= 2' */
- while (atomic_read(&count_count_start) != 1)
- mb();
- atomic_set(&count_count_stop, 0);
- smp_wmb();
+static uint32_t last_counter;
+static uint32_t max_warp;
+static int nr_warps;
+static int random_warps;
- /* Let the slave writes its count register */
- atomic_inc(&count_count_start);
+/*
+ * Counter warp measurement loop running on both CPUs.
+ */
+static uint32_t check_counter_warp(void)
+{
+ uint32_t start, now, prev, end, cur_max_warp = 0;
+ int i, cur_warps = 0;
- /* Count will be initialised to current timer */
- if (i == 1)
- initcount = read_c0_count();
+ start = read_c0_count();
+ end = start + (uint32_t) mips_hpt_frequency / 1000 * LOOP_TIMEOUT;
+ for (i = 0; ; i++) {
/*
- * Everyone initialises count in the last loop:
+ * We take the global lock, measure counter, save the
+ * previous counter that was measured (possibly on
+ * another CPU) and update the previous counter timestamp.
*/
- if (i == NR_LOOPS-1)
- write_c0_count(initcount);
+ arch_spin_lock(&sync_lock);
+ prev = last_counter;
+ now = read_c0_count();
+ last_counter = now;
+ arch_spin_unlock(&sync_lock);
/*
- * Wait for slave to leave the synchronization point:
+ * Be nice every now and then (and also check whether
+ * measurement is done [we also insert a 10 million
+ * loops safety exit, so we dont lock up in case the
+ * counter is totally broken]):
*/
- while (atomic_read(&count_count_stop) != 1)
- mb();
- atomic_set(&count_count_start, 0);
- smp_wmb();
- atomic_inc(&count_count_stop);
+ if (unlikely(!(i & 7))) {
+ if (now > end || i > 10000000)
+ break;
+ cpu_relax();
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
+ }
+ /*
+ * Outside the critical section we can now see whether
+ * we saw a time-warp of the counter going backwards:
+ */
+ if (unlikely(prev > now)) {
+ arch_spin_lock(&sync_lock);
+ max_warp = max(max_warp, prev - now);
+ cur_max_warp = max_warp;
+ /*
+ * Check whether this bounces back and forth. Only
+ * one CPU should observe time going backwards.
+ */
+ if (cur_warps != nr_warps)
+ random_warps++;
+ nr_warps++;
+ cur_warps = nr_warps;
+ arch_spin_unlock(&sync_lock);
+ }
+ }
+ WARN(!(now-start),
+ "Warning: zero counter calibration delta: %d [max: %d]\n",
+ now-start, end-start);
+ return cur_max_warp;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The freshly booted CPU initiates this via an async SMP function call.
+ */
+static void check_counter_sync_source(void *__cpu)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)__cpu;
+ int cpus = 2;
+
+ atomic_set(&test_runs, NR_LOOPS);
+retry:
+ /* Wait for the target to start. */
+ while (atomic_read(&start_count) != cpus - 1)
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ /*
+ * Trigger the target to continue into the measurement too:
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&start_count);
+
+ check_counter_warp();
+
+ while (atomic_read(&stop_count) != cpus-1)
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ /*
+ * If the test was successful set the number of runs to zero and
+ * stop. If not, decrement the number of runs an check if we can
+ * retry. In case of random warps no retry is attempted.
+ */
+ if (!nr_warps) {
+ atomic_set(&test_runs, 0);
+
+ pr_info("Counter synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%u]: passed\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), cpu);
+ } else if (atomic_dec_and_test(&test_runs) || random_warps) {
+ /* Force it to 0 if random warps brought us here */
+ atomic_set(&test_runs, 0);
+
+ pr_info("Counter synchronization [CPU#%d -> CPU#%u]:\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), cpu);
+ pr_info("Measured %d cycles counter warp between CPUs", max_warp);
+ if (random_warps)
+ pr_warn("Counter warped randomly between CPUs\n");
}
- /* Arrange for an interrupt in a short while */
- write_c0_compare(read_c0_count() + COUNTON);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ /*
+ * Reset it - just in case we boot another CPU later:
+ */
+ atomic_set(&start_count, 0);
+ random_warps = 0;
+ nr_warps = 0;
+ max_warp = 0;
+ last_counter = 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Let the target continue with the bootup:
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&stop_count);
/*
- * i386 code reported the skew here, but the
- * count registers were almost certainly out of sync
- * so no point in alarming people
+ * Retry, if there is a chance to do so.
*/
- pr_cont("done.\n");
+ if (atomic_read(&test_runs) > 0)
+ goto retry;
}
+/*
+ * Freshly booted CPUs call into this:
+ */
void synchronise_count_slave(int cpu)
{
- int i;
- unsigned long flags;
+ uint32_t cur_max_warp, gbl_max_warp, count;
+ int cpus = 2;
- local_irq_save(flags);
+ if (!cpu_has_counter || !mips_hpt_frequency)
+ return;
+ /* Kick the control CPU into the counter synchronization function */
+ smp_call_function_single(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask),
+ check_counter_sync_source,
+ (unsigned long *)(unsigned long)cpu, 0);
+retry:
/*
- * Not every cpu is online at the time this gets called,
- * so we first wait for the master to say everyone is ready
+ * Register this CPU's participation and wait for the
+ * source CPU to start the measurement:
*/
+ atomic_inc(&start_count);
+ while (atomic_read(&start_count) != cpus)
+ cpu_relax();
- for (i = 0; i < NR_LOOPS; i++) {
- atomic_inc(&count_count_start);
- while (atomic_read(&count_count_start) != 2)
- mb();
+ cur_max_warp = check_counter_warp();
- /*
- * Everyone initialises count in the last loop:
- */
- if (i == NR_LOOPS-1)
- write_c0_count(initcount);
+ /*
+ * Store the maximum observed warp value for a potential retry:
+ */
+ gbl_max_warp = max_warp;
+
+ /*
+ * Ok, we are done:
+ */
+ atomic_inc(&stop_count);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for the source CPU to print stuff:
+ */
+ while (atomic_read(&stop_count) != cpus)
+ cpu_relax();
- atomic_inc(&count_count_stop);
- while (atomic_read(&count_count_stop) != 2)
- mb();
+ /*
+ * Reset it for the next sync test:
+ */
+ atomic_set(&stop_count, 0);
+
+ /*
+ * Check the number of remaining test runs. If not zero, the test
+ * failed and a retry with adjusted counter is possible. If zero the
+ * test was either successful or failed terminally.
+ */
+ if (!atomic_read(&test_runs)) {
+ /* Arrange for an interrupt in a short while */
+ write_c0_compare(read_c0_count() + COUNTON);
+ return;
}
- /* Arrange for an interrupt in a short while */
- write_c0_compare(read_c0_count() + COUNTON);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ /*
+ * If the warp value of this CPU is 0, then the other CPU
+ * observed time going backwards so this counter was ahead and
+ * needs to move backwards.
+ */
+ if (!cur_max_warp)
+ cur_max_warp = -gbl_max_warp;
+
+ count = read_c0_count();
+ count += cur_max_warp;
+ write_c0_count(count);
+
+ pr_debug("Counter compensate: CPU%u observed %d warp\n", cpu, cur_max_warp);
+
+ goto retry;
+
}
-#undef NR_LOOPS
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 8:54 [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: clocksource cumulative enhancements Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] MIPS: csrc-r4k: Refine rating computation Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] MIPS: csrc-r4k: Apply verification clocksource flags Jiaxun Yang
2024-08-06 4:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-08-06 5:06 ` Jiaxun Yang
2024-08-06 5:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-08-06 15:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-08-08 7:35 ` Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] MIPS: csrc-r4k: Select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK if SMP && 64BIT Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] MIPS: csrc-r4k: Don't register as sched_clock if unfit Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` Jiaxun Yang [this message]
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Refine rating computation Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-21 11:18 ` Jiaxun Yang
2024-06-12 8:54 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] clocksource: mips-gic-timer: Correct sched_clock width Jiaxun Yang
2024-07-03 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] MIPS: clocksource cumulative enhancements Jiaxun Yang
2024-07-03 15:24 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2024-07-08 16:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612-mips-clks-v2-5-a57e6f49f3db@flygoat.com \
--to=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).