From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EF1FC12; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 04:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720759152; cv=none; b=Nr3PoXdH0CwV9Ho4RsOfMiaqraxT6Dc4044BGrbKWaqLpsu29BWVknF8vtcONzuaVu7qDbE9HwljD9PAlybsv5xTymiEB05KMEPpP2DnGyJYu7r+vYmxfWWhOnYDCpcFF+thWF5qir1NSuXFd5T8F2mGmzjbK0aM9Z8JqYXGVlQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720759152; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jFD0QbqRtwhNi4AqIG+ommVUe7wohMG8x1QNLLzGEn4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C00lgg1O87N239yL766ngUxPaHovIsaGUedvQSbBMyLy8yCQfc4rfso/AJZc5Hn7G9MzM0TPA8MYyGMTtNihWT1UZTcU0qFi8XGiXUgInBqSzDjME0JHCCc8FOrTKuVjIFx8JEnRSv+CDQ+i/yieQsPK1xMpu0mQ1PUPD+2FPEU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mEfVEBiA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mEfVEBiA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720759151; x=1752295151; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jFD0QbqRtwhNi4AqIG+ommVUe7wohMG8x1QNLLzGEn4=; b=mEfVEBiAiVRp+mJiyg0dlloBQR7QtKWI9kZhfMaz1wrp3ch4g51qmibF 7D+unD87g6sPC5I1RbzDbfaq1yeiYBUMP/i0MNmf9TSzKEazMLQ+FyWMQ EWdpUhMiUS0QgYpuM/BYRYrN2ly6jnRv7OKveUXN2VgGVTmN7HsFzyKZx EFoWDwdQhKYbkm+9oKs15fekE8zV+sl3XGaq3ddVGVawBFoyfjmcyev87 kOz9c8nTc0EHpwq8pBQjEEDg3rHp2oYIGi9Nv6Sow8rQRe6WH9XakdjkY /s8jKt/wi06QByuIlt6HAuLdtXlL5Geafl2sj6+/oldonLRdMLFaWgAw5 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ee2hP4NBTLa6bMykikct4w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6YdvmyG+QDaqTmlbM4KOWA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11130"; a="29579545" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,202,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="29579545" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2024 21:39:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tqJYofqXR6+Uzu7U3XBswQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: afLuhZKeQreKX217xga8Lw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,202,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="48880450" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 68891e0c336b) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2024 21:39:05 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 68891e0c336b with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1sS83i-000aKQ-1p; Fri, 12 Jul 2024 04:39:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:38:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Aleksandar Rikalo , Thomas Bogendoerfer Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Aleksandar Rikalo , Chao-ying Fu , Daniel Lezcano , Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg Ungerer , Hauke Mehrtens , Ilya Lipnitskiy , Jiaxun Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Paul Burton , Peter Zijlstra , Serge Semin , Thomas Gleixner , Tiezhu Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/11] irqchip/mips-gic: Support multi-cluster in for_each_online_cpu_gic() Message-ID: <202407121224.kUAil6pa-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240711082656.1889440-5-arikalo@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240711082656.1889440-5-arikalo@gmail.com> Hi Aleksandar, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/irq/core] [also build test WARNING on tip/timers/core linus/master v6.10-rc7] [cannot apply to daniel-lezcano/clockevents/next next-20240711] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aleksandar-Rikalo/MIPS-CPS-Add-a-couple-of-multi-cluster-utility-functions/20240711-164850 base: tip/irq/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711082656.1889440-5-arikalo%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v5 04/11] irqchip/mips-gic: Support multi-cluster in for_each_online_cpu_gic() config: mips-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240712/202407121224.kUAil6pa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240712/202407121224.kUAil6pa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407121224.kUAil6pa-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c:102: warning: expecting prototype for for_each_online_cpu_gic(). Prototype was for gic_unlock_cluster() instead vim +102 drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c 90 91 /** 92 * for_each_online_cpu_gic() - Iterate over online CPUs, access local registers 93 * @cpu: An integer variable to hold the current CPU number 94 * @gic_lock: A pointer to raw spin lock used as a guard 95 * 96 * Iterate over online CPUs & configure the other/redirect register region to 97 * access each CPUs GIC local register block, which can be accessed from the 98 * loop body using read_gic_vo_*() or write_gic_vo_*() accessor functions or 99 * their derivatives. 100 */ 101 static inline void gic_unlock_cluster(void) > 102 { 103 if (mips_cps_multicluster_cpus()) 104 mips_cm_unlock_other(); 105 } 106 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki