From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Q: arch/mips && __secure_computing(sd) with sd != NULL
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 17:22:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250118162238.GA31924@redhat.com> (raw)
From include/linux/seccomp.h
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
extern int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd);
in this case sd can be NULL, and only arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c uses sd != NULL
#else
static inline int __secure_computing(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
{
secure_computing_strict(sd->nr);
return 0;
}
in this case __secure_computing(NULL) will crash. This looks confusing.
And unnecessary.
Now lets look at arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c:syscall_trace_enter()
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP))) {
int ret, i;
struct seccomp_data sd;
unsigned long args[6];
sd.nr = current_thread_info()->syscall;
sd.arch = syscall_get_arch(current);
syscall_get_arguments(current, regs, args);
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
sd.args[i] = args[i];
sd.instruction_pointer = KSTK_EIP(current);
ret = __secure_computing(&sd);
if (ret == -1)
return ret;
}
#endif
Why? arch/mips/Kconfig selects HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER so it can just do
#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SECCOMP))) {
int ret = __secure_computing(NULL);
if (ret == -1)
return ret;
}
#endif
and rely on populate_seccomp_data() and sd == NULL checks in __secure_computing()
path ?
And given that arch/mips doesn't define CONFIG_GENERIC_ENTRY it can even do
int ret = secure_computing();
if (ret == -1)
return ret;
Did I miss something?
Note that if we change arch/mips we can do more cleanups, in particular
__secure_computing(sd) no longer needs the argument.
Oleg.
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-18 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-18 16:22 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-01-18 20:25 ` Q: arch/mips && __secure_computing(sd) with sd != NULL Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250118162238.GA31924@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox