From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C399C2C11ED; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755677773; cv=none; b=vCkIiGckLY7w+INJNyAvnYJcNUvb2kM6p0u3jKWZ4wVcU956Jc22BIlHUG9HNDT9nGBB/7EJzmibiTH8XOdMEOXBJ8vjFY47mhE5nLeQan24Q1ixf3/tPZOkvm2YnK/AGr+vymMW0Bo/++LIWP2kAOIY+QMBU/fysoHVS7nNri0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755677773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v3CYIS5qoS6/6JuTjFHHOmo5iS4e+MhOpakA/Lg7BdA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mYXf94mhORKZLioq9bbURE44HBPfa/7xlKWNuOYySMyw75FWhpvwgRYuvY8cI6Vt3ktgtM1Nn4jOXsZjMfkU0sRwDchwHwxjShhQCSKbOrG2Z+IICGQwRoW1vyVelRWgRVRwYl/iLX6JpLMCVJ2M9f66gj+NpAqDM51GzJ4eSYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dPhrCoss; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dPhrCoss" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE594C4CEEB; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:16:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755677773; bh=v3CYIS5qoS6/6JuTjFHHOmo5iS4e+MhOpakA/Lg7BdA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dPhrCossGZGTeltRt4rtpI0HNPkvQJ7kpL/rnbH5V62DREcQ1O58Z8IxuYWaxnDzW WPOso+v7iERDKIEye7PPnVU3t7Ana7tkF8l44c27X2Y5bnf8SHhMX841QhtlQPJllc EwV+gZekUBUKznbtwsLG9M26U4rQYGBYCFlddtHujlef2LRW6qXDY0pR+BEuq08U6R 7g20m/Z0E226R9PSiz6JXwUrbjhmM1j9Xn+RGaMhi9saxPDj8q1l64A73e5b0t0T3q agTohGClE7PinAwqJjYZn322Ugfr8nfkFRvwuklFAiR1XipxzgNZEcKFye/JVYrE1A oNAXVq3S1om+g== Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 10:16:10 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski Cc: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, john@phrozen.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: ebu: add name pattern Message-ID: <20250820-fluorescent-scrupulous-hawk-77fb39@kuoka> References: <20250815141759.3408909-1-olek2@wp.pl> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250815141759.3408909-1-olek2@wp.pl> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 04:17:40PM +0200, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote: > Lantiq target doesn't use Common clock Framework CCF does not matter. It's Linux thingy. You describe here hardware. > and requires strict hm? where? I checked kernel sources and there is nothing like that. > node names. This patch adds the name pattern to the binding. Again, why? Best regards, Krzysztof