From: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] MIPS: smp: report dying CPU to RCU in stop_this_cpu()
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 09:37:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608093729.12111-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com> (raw)
smp_send_stop() parks all secondary CPUs in stop_this_cpu(). The function
marks the CPU offline for the scheduler via set_cpu_online(false) but
never informs RCU, so RCU keeps expecting a quiescent state from CPUs
that are now spinning forever with interrupts disabled.
As long as nothing waits for an RCU grace period after smp_send_stop()
this is harmless, which is why it went unnoticed. Since commit
91840be8f710 ("irq_work: Fix use-after-free in irq_work_single() on PREEMPT_RT")
however, irq_work_sync() calls synchronize_rcu() on architectures without
an irq_work self-IPI, i.e. where arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() returns
false. That is the asm-generic default used by MIPS. Any irq_work_sync()
issued in the reboot/shutdown path after smp_send_stop() then blocks on
a grace period that can never complete, hanging the reboot:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 15 at kernel/irq_work.c:144 irq_work_queue_on
...
rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
rcu: Offline CPU 1 blocking current GP.
rcu: Offline CPU 2 blocking current GP.
rcu: Offline CPU 3 blocking current GP.
This issue was noticed on several Realtek MIPS switch SoCs (MIPS
interAptiv) and came up during kernel bump downstream in OpenWrt from
6.18.33 to 6.18.34, after the backport of the patch to the 6.18 stable
branch. The patch also has been backported all the way back to 6.1.
Call rcutree_report_cpu_dead() once interrupts are disabled, mirroring the
generic CPU-hotplug offline path, so RCU stops waiting on the parked CPUs
and grace periods can still complete. MIPS shuts down all CPUs here
without going through the CPU-hotplug mechanism, so this report is not
otherwise issued. Reporting a dying CPU to RCU outside the regular hotplug
offline path is not unprecedented: arm64 does the same in cpu_die_early().
There it is an exception for a CPU that was coming online and is aborting
bringup, rather than the default shutdown action as on MIPS.
Fixes: 91840be8f710 ("irq_work: Fix use-after-free in irq_work_single() on PREEMPT_RT")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
index 4868e79f3b30..0f28b4a62e72 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
@@ -422,6 +423,7 @@ static void stop_this_cpu(void *dummy)
set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), false);
calculate_cpu_foreign_map();
local_irq_disable();
+ rcutree_report_cpu_dead();
while (1);
}
--
2.51.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 9:37 Jonas Jelonek [this message]
2026-06-10 6:05 ` [PATCH v2] MIPS: smp: report dying CPU to RCU in stop_this_cpu() Huacai Chen
2026-06-15 7:00 ` Jonas Jelonek
2026-06-15 7:09 ` Huacai Chen
2026-06-15 7:16 ` Jonas Jelonek
2026-06-15 7:30 ` Huacai Chen
2026-06-15 7:40 ` Jonas Jelonek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608093729.12111-1-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--to=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox