From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14730C433F5 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 13:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241025AbiDINZ0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 09:25:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35302 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241882AbiDINZZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 09:25:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF1B9A9A3 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 06:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id lc2so1734574ejb.12 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 06:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CFsLuLri4ZzuxFZWMK4QbGgplfV1RiWIfvfyl0fXXPM=; b=JuUlSycWzsEw/r0jFMz9JwRuwtyT0Y7Q/BQu5h4xdSSU6heuxxnEEHiJAbq5O2FMnJ nvhasA1n/LKezFpGAk910XpeWCK3K0873+/GQwxGW2aUWRPwVLciFeA9jZin+txjOMhe KP9+5fWc87S2ImGZlf8uN+t6ImU1gv715j8WSNikxuyrY/XkAZAmGd3jpCbhgprci38T CfM0ogcxEo/pxTjtzQGDph7uQQavF0ES+fXNnhsZpeTLR1ln6nC2h+r/i5kj0fOI6bEW Jo6zni2rpb+flYw01ZxrvpOlL8Oxve33pJP9BECetmBxEsJkENybzWOya5lMT1qh93sQ rpMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CFsLuLri4ZzuxFZWMK4QbGgplfV1RiWIfvfyl0fXXPM=; b=8G9/X9BKUNQfDoMBVUAbeNnWqbcpEA9HNm1zHdyiek8TWB22IhV2zA5TtJw9EkDkBF kVEEz6/3B49nZxY/V75A5GSRoXHk0Sv/GpkaS3P9igGFmO2B75cCdNk6f6/3Rb/bsArG nFuap0NmS0tmGEqNsEsLquIJkA/9SZgpONoXrwjn4l9ur+bEISKSVoTGwpzgZjKFmZH/ jJAhGbyxtNw2+D73v51HqCAksYkw9BUSAA/1mjSTeytuR0OtwSqidBbmlfE8CQwyYe14 8GCgBBGbAOJuxK4euGNakzM/pwMxMIS8dkGVtmCJ+hfvmozAzYj5pQ1Y1sXzMBG0ln6Y 7XtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530quVaohFg73hpGA8giGCqZy5FHRkHhpE82LPkHGXEm3dwRNs4S uz0avPlaqd8uGiRt4ocjgoceIg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/ZL5SjGOTUIidyHTeqYDZw4kqPsYAOodMQYLCgvX6YAi/lThfvlEQviqPHkG7ehSftBVgbw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1be1:b0:6ce:b0a8:17d with SMTP id t1-20020a1709061be100b006ceb0a8017dmr22401411ejg.413.1649510596982; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 06:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.188] (xdsl-188-155-201-27.adslplus.ch. [188.155.201.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1-20020a056402194100b00416b174987asm11933953edz.35.2022.04.09.06.23.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Apr 2022 06:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2961d892-609c-c0bf-e9c1-c54306f608c7@linaro.org> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:23:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] MIPS: DTS: jz4780: fix otg node as reported by dtbscheck Content-Language: en-US To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , Paul Cercueil Cc: Rob Herring , Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org References: <298162bfa2e7225ccc753865e1ffa39ce2722b2a.1649443080.git.hns@goldelico.com> <3XN2AR.4ZAYNTAI4XBT3@crapouillou.net> <36C96109-0A56-4ACF-ACD1-367DAD9E3A47@goldelico.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <36C96109-0A56-4ACF-ACD1-367DAD9E3A47@goldelico.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On 09/04/2022 15:18, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: hould have a specific compatible. >>> Please mention why it does not. >> >> Agreed. The "snps,dwc2" should be a fallback string, otherwise there is no way to uniquely identify the JZ4780 implementation of the IP. > > Well, there is no specifc implementation and driver for it. So no need to uniquely identify it. Specific implementation and driver are not arguments here. This does not matter. It's really unrelated argument. Bindings are not about implementation in Linux. Implementation can change, so bindings should also? Best regards, Krzysztof