From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA85C9461; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 06:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751957543; cv=none; b=kzjCSOsFqclMlDB8LU7jlVOCUTIYOryDAuId2ENhAGsJBMo2/VY7WSHioKBRH+rEHIekR3zeGH7r923h/nhV0DwQenFyDURPa6nUYT6HB3AXmC4XU1EKN7O4QCWVNaapkKMb+hVs7Db7rUIMogt/ZmeufO828yit5zqeNcW4ej0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751957543; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QgkicBTpwhIu4KhwMQ9MKtUqejjyYnHk87N/snpkRoM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=f6Z4uTWaMO8GQ4FZzXFalcDreTnMfeGHcRHbPTGUVB5YSxkMBtA+6s7yJAWD68vv0bp/L9xZQuDHdrOD/gPmLAwW6bUHwpOJXWUpAdG6auTmCm00bm+XulCXTkV6/IbGQbTDVWOhPMjNyhoCAR3qqzqKZiBzqjVyD7v11cNmho4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=n4rnXU8Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="n4rnXU8Y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=QgkicBTpwhIu4KhwMQ9MKtUqejjyYnHk87N/snpkRoM=; t=1751957542; x=1753167142; b=n4rnXU8YwOUQP1z7Vh14gcY7GRmkgNNX04XcYJMzWOkDkBo Mu+AHAmEoxXdFpcmUMqXq7JqihpB+qgkt+l7Ep7KLwz0ZTpxVqQu8QVKDwgHzXvMwT5EwjVZKVhQW 8UZR5MBi3HMvBjEeWL9nrtl4E40Lr16l23O5P4qyS6KtLLKIvVI7sqKvVhAHQbEsbNSq+sRfSOXss iFDm5z2NQyARgBRjfMoF0uOMJu5kaqtXXNOsXMNXrvYVPt2o9aZ+SywBNrZxCYvViy6HCHY7BZ89e EqShB7dTWdOxvmgnJ91SGR92t2xJ/Pln2Nk+07Hy+5kCwSswCfMiLaIh0QxlfxjA==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uZ2BD-0000000BePp-1ddS; Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:51:54 +0200 Message-ID: <304f48242d99fec81990d492777cb45a58aa038c.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] wifi: rt2x00: add OF bindings + cleanup From: Johannes Berg To: Rosen Penev Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yangshiji66@qq.com, ansuelsmth@gmail.com, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Stanislaw Gruszka , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , open list , "open list:MIPS" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 08:51:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20250708_005520_408645_C4B0336E) References: <20250706214111.45687-1-rosenp@gmail.com> <8c6f18ca47bf0dd78b6675d8b94000679b6c75cd.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20250708_005520_408645_C4B0336E) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-1.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Mon, 2025-07-07 at 15:55 -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > >=20 > > Yeah well. That doesn't really mean it should be merged together though= , > > and we can pretty easily make that work by just putting the further wor= k > > in after net/wireless is merged back. > Looking at it again, I'm effectively removing rt2x00soc.c . Meaning > Felix' patch is mostly useless here. But we're not going to put your changes into 6.16. They're not even entirely ready yet, from what I see in the thread. > It might make more sense to submit this series at a later time. >=20 By end of the week Felix's patch should be in wireless-next too, if I get all the things done right... johannes