From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA36566 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA65436 for linux-list; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:37:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA07452; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:37:06 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (richardh@infopact.nl) Received: from bronx.bizarre.nl (9dyn101.breda.casema.net [195.96.116.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA08477; Thu, 24 Sep 1998 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (richardh@infopact.nl) Received: from infopact.nl (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bronx.bizarre.nl (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA03397; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <360ACACD.5533F8CA@infopact.nl> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 00:42:21 +0200 From: Richard Hartensveld X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.35 i686) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William J. Earl" CC: Alex deVries , Jeremy John Welling , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: challenge s boots linux References: <199809241644.JAA13188@fir.engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk William J. Earl wrote: > Alex deVries writes: > ... > > But, i've been thinking for awhile that an Indigo2 port would be the next > > box to target... i suppose there's no harm in looking at both machines > > concurrently. > > > > Getting docs on the Indigo2 would be quite important for a successful > > port, though. That would require SGI's help, and I can see them being a > > lot more open to it if we got the Indy completely supported first. > ... > > Except for the EISA slots, Indigo2 is pretty close to Indy. They run > the same IRIX kernel binary. The graphics are more of an issue, since most > Indigo2 systems use something other than Newport ("XL") graphics. It might > be possible for Linux to get by using the very basic microcode downloaded by > the PROM for XZ and other microcoded graphics cards, but I have not had time > to research the interface presented. > If i'll get my indigo2 with extreme gfx back to work, i'll see how far i can come with a kernel that usesa serial terminal for it's output. (no gfx card needed there). But first get my crosscompiler to work properly ;] Richard