From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA14981 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:41:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost)
	by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF)
	id KAA65291
	for linux-list;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:40:43 -0800 (PST)
	mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com)
Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37])
	by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF)
	via ESMTP id KAA82496
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>;
	Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:40:41 -0800 (PST)
	mail_from (richard@infopact.nl)
Received: from smtp1.casema.net (sun4000.casema.net [195.96.96.97]) 
	by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam:
       SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary
       systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email
       from the Internet.) 
	via ESMTP id KAA06686
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:40:40 -0800 (PST)
	mail_from (richard@infopact.nl)
Received: from infopact.nl (9dyn182.breda.casema.net [195.96.116.182]) by smtp1.casema.net (8.9.1/CASEMA) with ESMTP id TAA26380; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 19:39:53 +0100 (MET)
Posted-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 19:39:53 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <369F8C88.39CC6B03@infopact.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:44:25 -0800
From: Richard Hartensveld <richard@infopact.nl>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
CC: SGI Linux <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: linus.linux.sgi.com
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990115132049.12526A-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Alex deVries wrote:

> I don't mean to seem like a bother, but what is the deal with
> linus.linux.sgi.com? We really need that machine for development.  I think
> it's been a week now.
>
> If SGI isn't going to be able to support that service, that's fine.  Could
> you let us know so we can make other arrangements?
>

I've got a challenge S connected to the internet on a 34mbit connection,
running the (somewhat modificated) hardhat distribution.

I am more then willing to host the linux/SGI pages on this machine, and put
the machine up
for development if people are intrested.

I don't know if the www.linux.sgi.com machine is ever going to get back up,
but if it isn't,
this is maybe a solution?

Greetz,

Richard