From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA80351 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:23:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA30807 for linux-list; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:21:37 -0800 (PST) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA47541 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:21:34 -0800 (PST) mail_from (m_thrope@rigelfore.com) Received: from slug.rigelfore.com (c69494-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.2.21.88]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id VAA02483 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:21:32 -0800 (PST) mail_from (m_thrope@rigelfore.com) Received: (qmail 7787 invoked from network); 17 Feb 1999 05:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rigelfore.com) (192.168.42.2) by 192.168.42.1 with SMTP; 17 Feb 1999 05:31:25 -0000 Message-ID: <36CA5141.29588732@rigelfore.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 21:18:57 -0800 From: Eric Melville Organization: iLL X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de CC: Thomas Bogendoerfer , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: problem booting sgi linux References: <36C76479.62B097D2@rigelfore.com> <19990215013527.B2910@alpha.franken.de> <36C966DA.C7F506BA@rigelfore.com> <19990216202555.A1673@alpha.franken.de> <19990217004953.Q644@uni-koblenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk uhm... does this mean that i'm doing something wrong, or that the software doesn't quite support my hardware?... -E > Nope, no known problem, but we definately have a problem with the R4700. > Fixed. Not that Indys would use a R4700 ... > > I'll have to get V6.0 erratas, maybe that'll explain something.