From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA25239 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:22:47 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id NAA04367; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:18:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA61533 for linux-list; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:03:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA26323 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:03:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (neuroinc@unidial.com) Received: from mail.unidial.com (unidial.com [206.112.0.9]) by sgi.com (980305.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA3433064 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 13:03:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (neuroinc@unidial.com) Received: from unidial.com (root@pool-209-138-12-40.ipls.grid.net [209.138.12.40]) by mail.unidial.com (8.8.7/ntr.net 3.0.0) with ESMTP id UAA18197; Tue, 28 Sep 1999 20:01:55 GMT Message-ID: <37F1169E.B816C35E@unidial.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 19:27:26 +0000 From: Alan Hoyt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gavin Kistner CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Linux->Indy->O2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gavin Kistner wrote: > I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux. I'm wondering: does linux support for I believe Ulf Carlsson is working on REX3 support - that's Indy and Indigo2 > one machine get fully implemented and then tweaked to go to others, or is it a ground-up approach for each new machine in the port list? Two issues: X is huge and the architectures are quite different - your talking a *major* serious effort. - Alan Hoyt -