From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:58:11 -0700 Received: from gateway-490.mvista.com ([63.192.220.206]:38902 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 14:58:08 -0700 Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:jsun@orion.mvista.com [10.0.0.75]) by hermes.mvista.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e96INcx11110; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:23:38 -0700 Message-ID: <39DE7B4D.8514FC59@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 18:24:29 -0700 From: Jun Sun X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: "Kevin D. Kissell" , linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@oss.sgi.com, Dominic Sweetman Subject: Re: load_unaligned() and "uld" instruction References: <39CF9DFC.F30B302B@mvista.com> <200009252116.WAA01137@gladsmuir.algor.co.uk> <39CFC567.DD66BC56@mvista.com> <000d01c02782$32d31560$0deca8c0@Ulysses> <39D0E51C.79A0BE50@mvista.com> <20001005141354.E30075@bacchus.dhis.org> <39DD26CC.3805FFE8@mvista.com> <00d101c02f04$3a6d7340$0deca8c0@Ulysses> <39DD55E9.AFCACB0E@mvista.com> <20001006182821.B9061@bacchus.dhis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing Ralf Baechle wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 09:32:41PM -0700, Jun Sun wrote: > > > > > > > Ralf, before the perfect solution is found, the following patch makes > > > > > > the gcc complain go away. It just use ".set mips3" pragma. > > > > > > Which, as Ralf correctly observes, will generate code that will > > > crash on 32-bit CPUs, > > > > Why will it crash 32-bit CPUs? On my R5432 CPU, the lwl/lwr sequence > > executes just fine. > > That's a 64-bit CPU with a 32-bit bus ... > That is what the manual claims. However I did find something strange. I run the following code on R5432: 0x8019dc34 : ldl $a2,7($a0) 0x8019dc38 : ldr $a2,0($a0) 0x8019dc3c : srl $a2,$a2,0x10 As Kevin has guessed, it actually runs fine. However, the register content in $a2 is not right. Basically it appears that $a2 is a 32-bit register instead of 64-bit register. I put a srl instruction to make sure I was not fooled by gdb. I know R5432 is derived from R5000 FOR 32-bit systems. I guess there are probably a lot of short-cuts for 64-bit operations. Jun