From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:51:47 -0800 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:4860 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:51:34 -0800 Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:ppopov@zeus.mvista.com [10.0.0.112]) by hermes.mvista.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f19Ils811662 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:47:54 -0800 Message-ID: <3A843C2D.525643E7@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:51:25 -0800 From: Pete Popov Organization: Monta Vista Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586) X-Accept-Language: bg, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" Subject: irq.c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips-outgoing There's a dozen copies of "irq.c", and a few more files that do the same thing but are named differently. The irq.c in arch/mips/kernel doesn't seem to be used by any system. The PowerPC also has lots of variants also, but I believe they have a single irq.c file that all systems use. So I guess my question is, is anyone using arch/mips/kernel/irq.c, and does everyone plan on moving to that file (which seems like the right thing to do). Pete