"Kevin D. Kissell" wrote:
Here at MIPS Technologies, we use Linux internallyI think that one of the larger hurdles that we have had
for design verification, experiments, benchmarking,
etc., and as a consequence Carsten Langgaard and
myself have both been active in this forum, and have
tried to help the general Linux/MIPS community as
best we can with the limited time that we can dedicate
to the problem, in terms of suggested patches, bug
fixes, cleanups, integration of needed components
like the FPU emulator, etc.
1. A toolchain that will build 2.4.x version of the kernel as well
I have a question for those of you who are doing
Linux work for *new* platforms (as opposed to the
SGI/DEC legacy box support people). IF, and I
emphasize the word *if*, MIPS Technologies were
make a bigger investment in MIPS/Linux technology,
be it kernel enhancements, cross/native tools,
userland ports, libraries, or whatever, what would
be your prioritized "wish list"?
2. Userland app ports
Feel free to respond by point-to-point email, though
responses that are also copied to the mailing list
might provoke some interesting and enlightening
debate.Regards,
Kevin K.
From past experience it's easy to see that without a
solid set of development tools, it is hard to justify using
a particular CPU or hardware.
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jeff Harrell Work: (801) 619-6104 Broadband Access group/TI jharrell@ti.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~