From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4UJcim16133 for linux-mips-outgoing; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:38:44 -0700 Received: from hermes.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [12.44.186.158]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f4UJceh16128 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:38:40 -0700 Received: from mvista.com (IDENT:jsun@orion.mvista.com [10.0.0.75]) by hermes.mvista.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4UIxH028029; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:59:17 -0700 Message-ID: <3B1542D5.7D74C295@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:58:29 -0700 From: Jun Sun X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Scott Kasten" CC: linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Pthreads. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk "J. Scott Kasten" wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jun Sun wrote: > > > "J. Scott Kasten" wrote: > > > > > > If I recall correctly, some time ago, Jun Sun was looking at pthreads. > > > What is the status of threads in glibc-2.0.6/.7 and glibc-2.2.x for mips? > > > I.E. works, broken, how bad, to do??? > > > > > > > I found a bug in the kernel that causes register corruption, which causes > > pthread to fail. The bug has been fixed for a while in the CVS tree. I don't > > recall any glibc specific patches. > > If I recall correctly, that was S0 not being preserved under certain > system calls. Which I have taken care of. > > > > > Yes, it runs fine on my machines. > > > > Jun > > > > When you say runs fine, do you mean the 2.0.x, the 2.2.x or both? > > Thanks for your response. Both. There are some bug fixes needed to the get the new glibc 2.2.x working. Once the fixes are settled, we will post them. Jun