From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f57IRfk01699
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:27:41 -0700
Received: from localhost.cygnus.com (to-velocet.redhat.com [216.138.202.10])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f57IReh01696
	for <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:27:40 -0700
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DCD523C2B; Thu,  7 Jun 2001 14:27:39 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B1FC79B.3080104@cygnus.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 14:27:39 -0400
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD 1.5W macppc; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010605
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
Cc: GDB <gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com>, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com,
   linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: stabs or ecoff for Linux/mips
References: <20010607093332.C13198@lucon.org> <3B1FC23D.3020900@cygnus.com> <20010607111324.C15440@lucon.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 02:04:45PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> dwarf2
>> stabs
>> not ecoff (er, isn't ecoff an object format like coff? I guess you mean 
>> something like Dwarf1)
> 
> 
> Ok. I meant stabs in ecoff vs. stabs in elf.


dwarf2 in elf

Again ``There is nothing unstable about dwarf2 in elf''.


	Andrew