From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g54BVDnC022507
	for <linux-mips-outgoing@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 04:31:13 -0700
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g54BVD0O022506
	for linux-mips-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 04:31:13 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com using -f
Received: from t111.niisi.ras.ru (t111.niisi.ras.ru [193.232.173.111])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g54BV0nC022502;
	Tue, 4 Jun 2002 04:31:04 -0700
Received: from t06.niisi.ras.ru (t06.niisi.ras.ru [193.232.173.6])
	by t111.niisi.ras.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA00680;
	Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:33:04 +0400
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by t06.niisi.ras.ru (8.7.6/8.7.3) with UUCP id PAA11982; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:26:30 +0400
Received: from niisi.msk.ru (t34 [193.232.173.34]) by niisi.msk.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24621; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:27:08 +0400 (MSK)
Message-ID: <3CFCA520.C3D7DC03@niisi.msk.ru>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 15:31:44 +0400
From: "Gleb O. Raiko" <raiko@niisi.msk.ru>
Organization: NIISI RAN
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>
CC: Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, Alexandr Andreev <andreev@niisi.msk.ru>,
   linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 3 questions about linux-2.4.18 and R3000
References: <3CEEBBA9.5070809@niisi.msk.ru> <3CEEAC5F.6010802@mvista.com> <3CF2A17D.6050207@niisi.msk.ru> <3CF3BB4B.504@mvista.com> <3CF745B7.16CD0387@niisi.msk.ru> <20020603015536.B2832@dea.linux-mips.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-mips@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > > > I understand, but is there any __official__ recommended versions of these
> > > > utils? http://oss.sgi.com/mips/mips-howto.html is out-of-date :(
> 
> Send patches.

Does anybody have ideas what the patch shall contain? In the other
words, what versions of binutils and gcc will be considered stable.


> Nah, I don't consider myself an officer :-)

Sure. :-)

Regards,
Gleb.