From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-mips@oss.sgi.com" <linux-mips@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: LTP testing
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:21:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D186E76.63B33B0E@mips.com> (raw)
The next LTP failure line is:
pipe05 1 BROK : Unexpected signal 11 received.
For this one I haven't got a fix, because the failure is due to the way
the pipe syscall is implemented for MIPS (so we need a fix in both the
kernel and glibc).
The glibc code look like this
SYSCALL__ (pipe, 1)
/* Plop in the two descriptors. */
sw v0, 0(a0)
sw v1, 4(a0)
/* Go out with a clean status. */
move v0, zero
j ra
.end __pipe
The problem is that the code is called with $a0 = 0. So the 'sw v0,
0(a0)' after the syscall generates a segmentation fault.
Why are the pipe syscall implemented this way, where we return the two
descriptors in v0 and v1 ?
Why doesn't the kernel do these stores (this way we can do an access
check, like i386 does) ?
/Carsten
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-25 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-25 13:21 Carsten Langgaard [this message]
2002-06-25 13:53 ` LTP testing Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 14:18 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 14:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 15:06 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 15:28 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-06-25 14:28 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2002-06-25 14:39 ` Ralf Baechle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-25 10:47 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 9:59 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 12:07 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-25 7:15 Carsten Langgaard
2002-06-25 13:59 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D186E76.63B33B0E@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=ralf@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox