From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Kip Walker <kwalker@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: unaligned exception handling
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 09:38:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D9950FA.78C756EF@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D987A87.8B855D01@broadcom.com
You are right there is a potential problem in the 64-bit kernel, when
emulating load/store instructions.
I have previously addressed this problem (and also send a patch).
The problem is the check_axs macro, that checks the access before
actually doing the emulation (any load/stores).
It's a simple copy from the 32-bit kernel, where you do a check for user
space by simple check the most significant bit.
That's fine in the 32-bit world, but it's not sufficient in the 64-bit
case.
Locally I have a check_axs that look like this:
/*
* User code may only access USEG;
* Kernel code may access the entire address space, except the area
between
* USEG (XUSEG) and KSEG0.
*/
#define check_axs(pc,a,s) \
if (((pc < KUSIZE) && (((a) | ((a)+(s))) >= KUSIZE)) || \
((((a) | ((a)+(s))) < K0BASE) && \
(((a) | ((a)+(s))) >= KUSIZE))) \
goto sigbus;
Hope that helps you.
/Carsten
Kip Walker wrote:
> After inspecting a strange case in the mips64 kernel with address
> errors, I'm starting to think there's a problem in the do_ade()
> implementation. I think the 32-bit kernel may have a similar problem,
> but I haven't really inspected it. The issue is where the kernel's
> emulation of an address error causes another address error (NOT a page
> fault).
>
> Basically, I don't see how the exception table stuff in
> emulate_load_store_insn is going to work. Consider this scenario:
>
> - user process does a 'sw' (for example) to an illegal address
> above xuseg but below xsseg
> - do_ade calls emulate_load_store_insn, which tries swl/swr
> - the swl again hits an illegal address, this time in the
> kernel's context
> - do_ade does NOT check the exception table for the swl
> - emulate_load_store_insn goes to the 'swl' part of the switch
> - die_if_kernel DOES __die before the SIGBUS is delivered.
>
> So I don't see how the ex_table stuff is useful at all. Shouldn't
> do_ade() do the exception table grovelling before calling
> emulate_load_store_insn?
>
> Kip
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-01 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-30 16:23 unaligned exception handling Kip Walker
2002-10-01 7:38 ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D9950FA.78C756EF@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=kwalker@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox