Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>,
	atul srivastava <atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: a quick question regarding CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED..
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 14:49:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE77071.17FE9FED@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021129134230.A11704@linux-mips.org

Ralf Baechle wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:56:10PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > > We've talked about this before - the specification of the ll/sc
> > > instructions says they only work ok on cached memory.  In the real world
> > > they seem to work also in uncached memory but I'd not bet the farm on
> > > that, too many implementations out there, too many chances for subtle
> > > bugs.
> >
> >  Indeed -- CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED should either be removed or imply
> > CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC=n.  I suppose there is some interest in the option, so
> > the latter is preferable.  That would imply moving the option into the CPU
> > configuration section as now it's set very late, long after
> > CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC is set.  Or it could be set up the other way, i.e. the
> > option would only become available if CONFIG_CPU_HAS_LLSC had been set to
> > n.  There would be no need to move it then.
> >
> >  What do you think?
>
> I had the same thought.  So far there are the following groups of people
> using this option:
>
>   - Hardware people using it so the the entire program is becoming visible
>     externally.
>
>     Becoming obsoleted by more advanced, less intrusive hardware debugging
>     methods.
>
>   - Software people kluding around bugs in their software.
>
>     Don't expect me to support this.  Note with a line of code.
>
>   - For testing if the cache code is actually working.
>
>     Will only be useful to show big fat bugs.  For the more subtle bugs
>     there is no way at all around understanding the entire cache managment
>     thing including all subtilities.  Actually a good reason to not support
>     this option either.
>
> It's been my observation that hardly any user is aware of these consquences
> nor is the Linux code making a good attempt at complying with all the
> additional restrictions of running uncached.  So in my oppinion
> CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED should go.  But I don't feel very strong about it so
> I'm going to wait for a few days so others have a chance to raise their
> voice.
>

I have used this option a lot, it has been very useful in hardware (CPU)
debugging.


>
>   Ralf

--
_    _ ____  ___   Carsten Langgaard   Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\  /|||___)(___   MIPS Denmark        Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ |||    ____)  Lautrupvang 4B      Switch: +45 4486 5555
  TECHNOLOGIES     2750 Ballerup       Fax...: +45 4486 5556
                   Denmark             http://www.mips.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-29 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-27  9:11 a quick question regarding CONFIG_MIPS_UNCACHED atul srivastava
2002-11-28 15:51 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-28 16:15   ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-29 11:56     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-29 12:42       ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-29 13:03         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-29 13:42           ` Ralf Baechle
2002-11-29 14:23             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-11-29 13:49         ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DE77071.17FE9FED@mips.com \
    --to=carstenl@mips.com \
    --cc=atulsrivastava9@rediffmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox