From: Carsten Langgaard <carstenl@mips.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Dominic Sweetman <dom@algor.co.uk>,
chris@mips.com, kevink@mips.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: The 64-bit version of __access_ok is broken.
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:30:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DF4629B.F377F711@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021209051845.A31939@linux-mips.org
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:28:07PM +0100, Carsten Langgaard wrote:
>
> > I have addressed this issue before, and I do it again, because we have a
> > potential kernel crash situation, if this isn't fixed.
> >
> > The __access_ok macro in include/asm-mips64/uaccess.h and the check_axs
> > macro in arch/mips64/kernel/unaligned.c need to be changed in order to
> > work correctly, it's a copy from the 32-bit kernel. It's not good enough
> > to simply check for the "sign bit" of the address.
> > The area between USEG (XUSEG) and KSEG0 will in 64-bit addressing mode
> > generate an address error, if accessed.
> > The size of the area depend on the number of virtual addressing bits
> > implemented in the CPU.
> >
> > Please take a look at the patch below.
> > I think Ralf had some objection the last time I send it, about the fix,
> > not being efficient enough (performance vice), but I think we need to
> > consider stability and functionality over performance. So until someone
> > comes up with a better solution, I think we need this fix.
>
> Standard Linux approach - a bad solution is worse than no solution.
>
> Just to show the impact of your patch:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 1817824 1079664 173664 3071152 2edcb0 vmlinux-cvs
> 1870752 1079664 173664 3124080 2fab70 vmlinux-carsten
>
> So that's 52928 bytes of bloat.
> __access_ok is one of those kernel
> functions that are inlined so often that each extra instruction needs a
> _very_ good justification.
I really disagree.
My solution may impact the size of the kernel (the increase is less than 2
percent), but it prevent kernel crashes.
Sure we may be able to find a better solution, but it has been almost 1/2 year ago,
the last time I addressed this problem.
I know at least one other on the list was hit by this problem.
>
> The patch below adds 32 bytes. It's still not the right thing though. It's
> not fixing all stuff in the assembler code. I have a better patch but it
> results in odd userspace behaviour. Smells like a compiler problem ...
I tried you patch below, but then nothing seems to work.
>
> Ralf
>
> Index: arch/mips64/kernel/process.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/arch/mips64/kernel/process.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.18.2.9
> diff -u -r1.18.2.9 process.c
> --- arch/mips64/kernel/process.c 2 Dec 2002 00:24:52 -0000 1.18.2.9
> +++ arch/mips64/kernel/process.c 7 Dec 2002 02:13:40 -0000
> @@ -52,17 +52,19 @@
> void start_thread(struct pt_regs * regs, unsigned long pc, unsigned long sp)
> {
> unsigned long status;
> + int compat32 = current->thread.mflags & MF_32BIT;
>
> /* New thread looses kernel privileges. */
> status = regs->cp0_status & ~(ST0_CU0|ST0_FR|ST0_KSU);
> status |= KSU_USER;
> - status |= (current->thread.mflags & MF_32BIT) ? 0 : ST0_FR;
> + status |= compat32 ? 0 : ST0_FR;
> regs->cp0_status = status;
> current->used_math = 0;
> loose_fpu();
> regs->cp0_epc = pc;
> regs->regs[29] = sp;
> current->thread.current_ds = USER_DS;
> + current->thread.user_ds.seg = - (compat32 ? 0x80000000UL : TASK_SIZE);
> }
>
> void exit_thread(void)
> Index: include/asm-mips64/processor.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/include/asm-mips64/processor.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.32.2.9
> diff -u -r1.32.2.9 processor.h
> --- include/asm-mips64/processor.h 4 Nov 2002 19:39:56 -0000 1.32.2.9
> +++ include/asm-mips64/processor.h 7 Dec 2002 02:14:10 -0000
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
> #define MF_LOGADE 2 /* Log address errors to syslog */
> #define MF_32BIT 4 /* Process is in 32-bit compat mode */
> unsigned long mflags;
> - mm_segment_t current_ds;
> + mm_segment_t current_ds, user_ds;
> unsigned long irix_trampoline; /* Wheee... */
> unsigned long irix_oldctx;
> };
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@
> /* \
> * For now the default is to fix address errors \
> */ \
> - MF_FIXADE, { 0 }, 0, 0 \
> + MF_FIXADE, KERNEL_DS, { -TASK_SIZE }, 0, 0 \
> }
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> Index: include/asm-mips64/uaccess.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/include/asm-mips64/uaccess.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.13.2.1
> diff -u -r1.13.2.1 uaccess.h
> --- include/asm-mips64/uaccess.h 1 Jul 2002 15:27:31 -0000 1.13.2.1
> +++ include/asm-mips64/uaccess.h 7 Dec 2002 02:14:10 -0000
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> * For historical reasons, these macros are grossly misnamed.
> */
> #define KERNEL_DS ((mm_segment_t) { (unsigned long) 0L })
> -#define USER_DS ((mm_segment_t) { (unsigned long) -1L })
> +#define USER_DS (current->thread.user_ds)
>
> #define VERIFY_READ 0
> #define VERIFY_WRITE 1
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> (__builtin_constant_p(size) && (signed long) (size) > 0 ? 0 : (size))
>
> #define __access_ok(addr,size,mask) \
> - (((signed long)((mask)&(addr | (addr + size) | __ua_size(size)))) >= 0)
> + (((mask) & (addr | (addr + size) | __ua_size(size))) == 0)
>
> #define __access_mask ((long)(get_fs().seg))
>
--
_ _ ____ ___ Carsten Langgaard Mailto:carstenl@mips.com
|\ /|||___)(___ MIPS Denmark Direct: +45 4486 5527
| \/ ||| ____) Lautrupvang 4B Switch: +45 4486 5555
TECHNOLOGIES 2750 Ballerup Fax...: +45 4486 5556
Denmark http://www.mips.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-05 15:28 The 64-bit version of __access_ok is broken Carsten Langgaard
2002-12-09 4:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-09 9:30 ` Carsten Langgaard [this message]
2002-12-09 11:54 ` Dominic Sweetman
2002-12-09 12:27 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-12-09 18:38 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-10 7:50 ` Carsten Langgaard
2002-12-10 12:40 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-09 16:36 ` Ralf Baechle
2002-12-10 8:55 ` Carsten Langgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DF4629B.F377F711@mips.com \
--to=carstenl@mips.com \
--cc=chris@mips.com \
--cc=dom@algor.co.uk \
--cc=kevink@mips.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox