Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:38:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ef9dfc9-3d0f-434d-9836-066265975728@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240209181600.9472-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>



On 2/9/24 12:16, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
> 
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm6345_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
> 
> struct bcm6345_l1_cpu {
> 	[...]
> 	u32	enable_cache[];
> };
> 
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
> 
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>

LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks
-- 
Gustavo

> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> index 9745a119d0e6..eb02d203c963 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __init bcm6345_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
>   	else if (intc->n_words != n_words)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> 
> -	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
> +	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(struct_size(cpu, enable_cache, n_words),
>   					GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!cpu)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09 18:16 [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2024-02-10  0:19 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10  1:19 ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ef9dfc9-3d0f-434d-9836-066265975728@embeddedor.com \
    --to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox