From: Peter Buckingham <peter@pantasys.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] fix mips atomic_lock declaration
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:24:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41463A54.1030401@pantasys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040914002237.GA21739@linux-mips.org>
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> No. atomic_lock is intentionally undefined, so this patch seems very
> broken.
if i don't change it to static it won't compile correctly. so obviously
i don't get something.
it seems that the bcm1250 needs atomic_lock to be defined for the fall
through case for smp. either that or i need to figure out how to write
the assemble code for the SB1 case...
what do you think needs to be done?
peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-14 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-13 22:33 [PATCH 2.6] fix mips atomic_lock declaration Peter Buckingham
2004-09-14 0:22 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-09-14 0:24 ` Peter Buckingham [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41463A54.1030401@pantasys.com \
--to=peter@pantasys.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox