From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:39:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from schenk.ISAR.de ([IPv6:::ffff:212.14.78.13]:27689 "EHLO schenk.isar.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:39:47 +0000 Received: from gwhaus.rt.schenk (gwhaus.rt.schenk [172.22.0.4]) by schenk.isar.de (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id j0AFdj416045; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:39:45 +0100 Received: from [172.22.10.24] (pcimr4.rt.schenk [172.22.10.24]) by gwhaus.rt.schenk (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id j0AFdji10820; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:39:45 +0100 Message-ID: <41E2A1C1.4010709@schenk.isar.de> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:39:45 +0100 From: Rojhalat Ibrahim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thiemo Seufer CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Further TLB handler optimizations References: <20041223202526.GA2254@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20041224040051.93587.qmail@web52806.mail.yahoo.com> <20041224085645.GJ3539@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050107190605.GG31335@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <41E27A6A.5060204@schenk.isar.de> <20050110140429.GC15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050110143535.GE15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> In-Reply-To: <20050110143535.GE15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6869 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ibrahim@schenk.isar.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > >>Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: >> >>>Thiemo Seufer wrote: >>> >>>>I updated the patch now and checked it in. Please test, especially >>>>for cases I couldn't do, like R3000-style TLB handling and MIPS32 >>>>CPUs with 64bit physaddr. >>>> >>> >>>My Yosemite board (RM9000 processor) does not boot anymore with >>>CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR. Without that option it seems to be working >>>as before. I tried to define cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs. >> >>Correct, this should always be defined for 64bit capable CPUs. >> >> >>>With that it boots partly. >> >>Where does it fail? > > > It's probably caused by the bug I just found. Please try the appended > patch and tell me if it changes something for you. > > Thanks, but I had already found that one. Sorry, I forgot to mention it. Doesn't change a thing, except that I can compile the kernel without errors.