From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:11:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from schenk.ISAR.de ([IPv6:::ffff:212.14.78.13]:61483 "EHLO schenk.isar.de") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:10:54 +0000 Received: from gwhaus.rt.schenk (gwhaus.rt.schenk [172.22.0.4]) by schenk.isar.de (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id j0B8Ap422267; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:10:51 +0100 Received: from [172.22.10.24] (pcimr4.rt.schenk [172.22.10.24]) by gwhaus.rt.schenk (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id j0B8Aoi15902; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:10:50 +0100 Message-ID: <41E38A0A.1010507@schenk.isar.de> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:10:50 +0100 From: Rojhalat Ibrahim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thiemo Seufer CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Further TLB handler optimizations References: <20041223202526.GA2254@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20041224040051.93587.qmail@web52806.mail.yahoo.com> <20041224085645.GJ3539@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050107190605.GG31335@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <41E27A6A.5060204@schenk.isar.de> <20050110140429.GC15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <41E29DF5.6040800@schenk.isar.de> <20050110154246.GH15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> In-Reply-To: <20050110154246.GH15344@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6877 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ibrahim@schenk.isar.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > This would be a different bug then. It should be relatively easy to > catch, there aren't that many places where cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs is > used. > > I see you already fixed it. Works fine now. Thanks a lot. Rojhalat Ibrahim