From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 08 Feb 2005 03:04:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([IPv6:::ffff:12.44.186.158]:23549 "EHLO hermes.mvista.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:04:14 +0000 Received: from mvista.com (prometheus.mvista.com [10.0.0.139]) by hermes.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58AF189DA; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:04:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42082C2C.5020703@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:04:12 -0800 From: Manish Lachwani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle Cc: TheNop , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Kernel crash on yosemite References: <4207F163.4010605@gmx.net> <20050208013000.GA6131@linux-mips.org> <42081A2C.5060503@mvista.com> <20050208015155.GB15336@linux-mips.org> <42081DA0.6070301@mvista.com> <20050208023349.GC15336@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20050208023349.GC15336@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7199 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: mlachwani@mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Ralf Baechle wrote: >On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:02:08PM -0800, Manish Lachwani wrote: > > > >>I completely agree. In any case, I dont think the CVS sources ever >>supported SMP for Titan < 1.2, correct? >> >> > >No, that would have either meant taking a heavy performance penalty or >hacking mm in very ugly ways. > How would I not know this? After all, I was the one who actually put this code together to get SMP to work on Titan 1.0 and 1.1, remember? ;) And you are right, there is no reason to put such hacks. Manish Lachwani >And due to the probably low numbers of >the early silicon and the availability of later revisions the reason >for such hacks was low anyway. > > Ralf > > >