Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
Cc: Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: IPTables 1.3.x fails on RaQ2
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:40:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <422D3AC9.4020601@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <422D2801.2060903@jg555.com>

Jim Gifford wrote:
> I just don't understand why iptables needs that file at all, I can't 
> find anything in it that uses it. I'm going to search again, and I will 
> post my results once I figure it out.

iptables doesn't need it.  It's one of those funky #include chains.  include A 
includes B which includes C which includes Q and so on until it tries 
including a file it can't find.  This is because there are a series of mach-* 
machine subdirs in include/asm-mips that each contain headers specific to a 
particular machine type (like spaces.h, among other things).  I haven't delved 
into the specifics (someone else here can explain it more), but when the 
kernel builds, based upon the configuration of the kernel, it knows which 
include/asm-mips/mach-* directory to look in to snag the headers it needs. 
Userland doesn't know this, so for headers used in userland, you need to patch 
things abit.  Otherwise, they break.

http://tinyurl.com/5grah  <-- appCompat patch used in Gentoo's linux-headers 
2.6.10 ebuild.  It lacks mips-specific bits, but you can look at how x86 
handles some of its include/asm-i386/mach-* sections for how we're working 
around these issues.  It's all a hack really, until someone either fixes 
userland to never use kernel headers, or the kernel-side finds a way to create 
userland-friendly headers (but I don't see any of this happening anytime soon).


--Kumba

-- 
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small 
hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." 
--Elrond

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-08  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-07 17:20 IPTables 1.3.x fails on RaQ2 Jim Gifford
2005-03-07 17:37 ` freshy98
2005-03-08  2:26   ` Kumba
2005-03-08  4:20     ` Jim Gifford
2005-03-08  5:40       ` Kumba [this message]
2005-03-08  6:46         ` freshy98
2005-03-08  7:35           ` Jim Gifford
2005-03-08 13:24             ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-08 16:30               ` Jim Gifford
2005-03-08 16:37                 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-08 13:46             ` Kumba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=422D3AC9.4020601@gentoo.org \
    --to=kumba@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=maillist@jg555.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox