From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:12:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from 64-30-195-78.dsl.linkline.com ([IPv6:::ffff:64.30.195.78]:51880 "EHLO jg555.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:12:10 +0100 Received: from [172.16.0.150] (w2rz8l4s02.jg555.com [::ffff:172.16.0.150]) (AUTH: PLAIN root, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by jg555.com with esmtp; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:12:07 -0800 id 0000C338.4249D2B7.00003F8D Message-ID: <4249D27D.20700@jg555.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:11:09 -0800 From: Jim Gifford User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Horton CC: Linux MIPS List Subject: Re: Build 64bit on RaQ2 References: <42449F47.8010002@jg555.com> <20050326091218.GA2471@skeleton-jack> <42488DFC.20408@jg555.com> <20050329214641.GA5152@skeleton-jack> In-Reply-To: <20050329214641.GA5152@skeleton-jack> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7541 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: maillist@jg555.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Peter Horton wrote: >On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 03:06:36PM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote: > > >> Got it to compile, but the tulip driver is giving me fits. I built >>it as a module and into the kernel >> >> >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >>0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed >> >> >> > >Tulip driver gave me problems also. I landed up inserting a printk() >which made it work, see the patch. I didn't get round to debugging it >any further, sorry. > >P. > > > I posted a simliar question to the linux-net list, a lot of people don't understand why the driver doesn't work in 64 bit, but works perfectly in 32 bit. -- ---- Jim Gifford maillist@jg555.com