From: "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@gentoo.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Bryan Althouse <bryan.althouse@3phoenix.com>,
"'Linux/MIPS Development'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Seg fault when compiled with -mabi=64 and -lpthread
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 12:39:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42C571C3.1060703@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507011613510.30138@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
>>The segfault with kernel oops that I can't get around occurs while
>>glib's configure script is checking for libpthread. Specifically, it
>>links http://beerandrocks.net:8080/~spbecker/oops/conftest.c against
>>libpthread and then runs it.
>
>
> And libpthread is part of glibc, not glib. So if an autoconf test (which
> I'm assuming is AC_CHECK_LIB() rather than a hand-crafted hack) breaks on
> running a program linked against libpthread, then it's not a problem with
> glib, but probably with either glibc or the toolchain used.
I'm aware of this. It just sounded like Daniel was questioning whether
or not my glibc was compiling/working in the first place.
>>I've somewhat convinced myself this is either a kernel and/or a header
>>problem. It seems I'm only able to reproduce this problem when trying
>>to compile and run that code while running 2.6.12 from cvs. As I
>>previously mentioned, I tested the offending code on a kernel I compiled
>>from a 2.6.10 snapshot some time ago, and it ran with no segfault or oops.
>
>
> If you get an Oops when running software as non-root, then it's a kernel
> bug, no matter what.
>
Yes, it certainly happens when running as a non-privileged user. If I
get a bit of time later today, I was going to try and track down which
cvs commit and/or kernel version broke things.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-01 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-30 17:33 Seg fault when compiled with -mabi=64 and -lpthread Bryan Althouse
2005-06-30 19:08 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-06-30 19:31 ` Bryan Althouse
2005-06-30 20:21 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-06-30 21:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-30 22:09 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-07-01 3:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-01 4:44 ` Kumba
2005-07-01 8:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-01 13:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-01 14:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-01 14:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-01 15:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-01 14:56 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-07-01 15:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-07-01 16:39 ` Stephen P. Becker [this message]
2005-07-01 17:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-01 17:15 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-07-01 15:09 ` Bryan Althouse
2005-07-01 14:54 ` sjhill
2005-07-01 15:09 ` Bryan Althouse
2005-07-01 15:29 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42C571C3.1060703@gentoo.org \
--to=geoman@gentoo.org \
--cc=bryan.althouse@3phoenix.com \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox