From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:15:30 +0100 (BST)
Received: from eth13.com-link.com ([208.242.241.164]:50658 "EHLO
	real.realitydiluted.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id S8133445AbVJVDO5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:14:57 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
	by real.realitydiluted.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Debian))
	id 1ET8ug-0006gb-Un; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:15:15 -0500
Message-ID: <4359AEAD.8010604@realitydiluted.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:14:53 -0500
From:	"Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@realitydiluted.com>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:	Aaditya Rai <arai@atheros.com>
CC:	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability.
References: <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com>
In-Reply-To: <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <sjhill@realitydiluted.com>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 9337
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: sjhill@realitydiluted.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

Aaditya Rai wrote:
> Hi everyone, I've searched the list for an answer and gotten, "there's 
> no stable release; check out from cvs" ;-)
> I'm trying to figure out if there are stability issues with mips port of 
> 2.6? Specifically for 24K? Is mips-2.4 generally considered to be more 
> stable?
>
Use 2.6 if you are working with 24K. Yes, it is stable that's why we are
using 2.6 and not 2.5 because the even numbers are stable releases. *sigh*
Geesh, kids these days.

-Steve