From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:23:09 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 209-232-97-206.ded.pacbell.net ([209.232.97.206]:40412 "EHLO
	dns0.mips.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133470AbVJVRWw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org>);
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:22:52 +0100
Received: from mercury.mips.com (sbcns-dmz [209.232.97.193])
	by dns0.mips.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9MHMRje017616;
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.236.16] (grendel [192.168.236.16])
	by mercury.mips.com (8.12.9/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9MHMP17007474;
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <435A759F.5010601@mips.com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:23:43 +0200
From:	"Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
CC:	Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
	Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [Slightly-OT] VR4110 core
References: <435818D5.7080807@bootc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510210958520.32398@numbat.sonytel.be> <4358EA41.4090001@bootc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510211536380.32398@numbat.sonytel.be> <4358F910.2020204@bootc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510212038220.9129@numbat.sonytel.be> <435A51A8.9030602@bootc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510221857510.16077@numbat.sonytel.be>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510221857510.16077@numbat.sonytel.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Return-Path: <kevink@mips.com>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 9341
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: kevink@mips.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Chris Boot wrote:
> 
>>Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Chris Boot wrote:
>>>
>>>>Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Chris Boot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hmm, glancing at the "Product Letter" I have, it does mention
>>>>>>"Enhanced
>>>>>>Multi-Media Architecture" so I'm guessing its an EMMA SoC indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you have to part number?
>>>>
>>>>Did I not send one?! It must have been late...
>>>>
>>>>It's a uPD61032, marked D61032GL on the chip. The exact markings are:
>>>>NEC JAPAN
>>>>D61032GL
>>>>9949EK019
>>>
>>>That's indeed the EMMA.
>>
>>Now we know what it is...where do I find the docs?
> 
> 
> I'm afraid it's available under NDA from NEC only :-(

Note, however, that the group that develops EMMA chips is based
in the UK.  If you contact them and ask nicely, there's at least
a chance that they could provide some documentation for student
work.
		Regards,

		Kevin K.