From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:22:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from webmail.ict.ac.cn ([159.226.39.7]:43699 "HELO ict.ac.cn") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S8133455AbWD1NWY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:22:24 +0100 Received: (qmail 12813 invoked by uid 507); 28 Apr 2006 12:27:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.202?) (fxzhang@222.92.8.142) by ict.ac.cn with SMTP; 28 Apr 2006 12:27:24 -0000 Message-ID: <445216D0.3000807@ict.ac.cn> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:21:20 +0800 From: Fuxin Zhang User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: "Kevin D. Kissell" , gowri@bitel.co.kr, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Java virtual machine on linux MIPS References: <1146188366.3034.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <000d01c66a9c$c6686290$10eca8c0@grendel> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 11237 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fxzhang@ict.ac.cn Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips we have ported sun jdk 1.5 as a research work, both interpreted & jit works, many programs run well but still with some bugs left. Not sure whether we can redistribute it(license, agreement of our institute etc.) Maciej W. Rozycki 写道: > On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > >> It's been several years, but at one point I successfully tested >> and benchmarked commercail JVMs from Insignia (now part >> of Esmertec, www.esmertec.com) and Skelmir (www.skelmir.com), >> and managed to get the open source Kaffe VM (www.kaffe.org) >> running on MIPS Linux as well. Kaffe has a JIT that has, alas, >> been broken for MIPS and most other RISC architectures for >> the last couple of years, but the JVM still works OK in interpreted >> mode. I'm sure that there are other options - those are just the ones >> I've had hands-on experience with. > > And there is of course GIJ -- a part of GCC (which is also able to > compile Java source code to native machine code and link it with Java > bytecode if necessary). I'm not sure how capable it is these days though. > > Maciej > > >