From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Commit 78eef01b0fae087c5fadbd85dd4fe2918c3a015f (on_each_cpu(): disable local interrupts) Breaks SGI IP32
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:20:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4479250E.3080604@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060527194243.a8157338.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> on_each_cpu() calls smp_call_function(). It is not correct to call
> smp_call_function() with local interrupts disabled, because it can lead to
> deadlocks.
>
> Therefore on_each_cpu() also must not be called with local interrupts
> disabled. Therefore on_each_cpu() may use
> local_irq_disable()/local_irq_enable().
>
>> A while ago I've
>> fixes all such calls but I may have missed some instances.
>>
>> Andrew, what was the reason for 78eef01b0fae087c5fadbd85dd4fe2918c3a015f ?
>>
>
> That change made the various calling environments consistent, as described
> in the changelog.
>
> If it's really, really not deadlocky to call smp_call_function() with
> interrupts disabled at that time in the MIPS kernel bringup then I'd
> suggest you should open-code an smp_call_function() and put a big comment
> over it explaining why it's done this way, and why it isn't deadlocky.
>
> <tries to remember what the deadlock is>
>
> If CPU A is running smp_call_function() it's waiting for CPU B to run the
> handler.
>
> But if CPU B is presently _also_ running smp_call_function(), it's waiting
> for CPU A to run the handler.
>
> If either of those CPUs is waiting for the other with local interrupts
> disabled, that CPU will never respond to the other CPU's IPI and they'll
> deadlock.
The catch is, the system being affected here is strictly a UP machine. It's
impossible to make an O2 go SMP. It seems that the disable call in the UP
version of on_each_cpu() (which I assume is the #define macro) is what's causing
this issue, since the machine comes to a halt in the dark void between function
calls (i.e., that memset() I alluded to earlier)
So I'm wondering, is there a way to see if the IRQ handlers have been installed
already prior to disabling them, or is this more of a machine-specific oddity
wherein the IRQ handlers need to be setup earlier (I don't even know if this is
even possible/relevant to O2 systems)?
It also seems this was affecting AMD Alchemy-based systems too. Other SGI
machines are known to work fine, except Indy and Indigo2, as I haven't tested
those yet.
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-28 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-27 21:13 Commit 78eef01b0fae087c5fadbd85dd4fe2918c3a015f (on_each_cpu(): disable local interrupts) Breaks SGI IP32 Kumba
2006-05-28 1:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-05-28 2:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-28 4:20 ` Kumba [this message]
2006-05-28 4:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-28 7:42 ` Kumba
2006-05-28 10:50 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-06-21 9:51 ` Domen Puncer
2006-06-21 12:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-06-22 6:49 ` Domen Puncer
2006-06-27 8:19 ` Domen Puncer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4479250E.3080604@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox