From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:07:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:28640 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20037897AbWLAPHH (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:07:07 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.248] (unknown [10.150.0.9]) by imap.sh.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0510C3ECA; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 07:06:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45704569.8000807@ru.mvista.com> Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:08:25 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Is _do_IRQ() not needed anymore ? References: <20061201.185740.03976990.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20061201.191049.63741937.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 13296 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hello. Atsushi Nemoto wrote: >>>If _all_ irq chip were converted to use flow handler, >>>GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ will be good. But we have i8259... >>That's why in my example I made GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ config >>default to 'n' and selected by a irq chip that doens't use __do_IRQ() >>anymore, well I think... > You can use both irq_cpu and i8259 same time. :) What's wrong with 8259 I wonder? It's happily converted to genirq by other arches... > --- > Atsushi Nemoto WBR, Sergei