From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:06:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from father.pmc-sierra.com ([216.241.224.13]:23531 "HELO father.pmc-sierra.bc.ca") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S20038765AbXBVXGp (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:06:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 18917 invoked by uid 101); 22 Feb 2007 23:05:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca) (216.241.226.184) by father.pmc-sierra.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2007 23:05:33 -0000 Received: from bby1exi01.pmc_nt.nt.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca [216.241.231.251]) by pmxedge2.pmc-sierra.bc.ca (8.13.4/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l1MN5RKu016177 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:32 -0800 Received: by bby1exi01.pmc-sierra.bc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:26 -0800 Message-ID: <45DE21B1.3070309@pmc-sierra.com> From: Marc St-Jean To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Questions on the procedure/policy for patch submission Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:05:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) x-originalarrivaltime: 22 Feb 2007 23:05:22.0069 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDC82C50:01C756D5] user-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14208 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: Marc_St-Jean@pmc-sierra.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips 1a. Do patches living completely in arch/mips and include/asm-mips only have to be submitted to the l-m.o? 1b. If so, does this imply that l-m.o will push them to kernel.org? 2a. Do patches which are outside the above directories have the be submitted to the kernel.org list? 2b. If so, how are dependencies between the two sets of submission handled during the review process? Thanks, Marc