From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:08:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:21738 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S28639723AbXBZUId (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:08:33 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.248] (unknown [10.150.0.9]) by imap.sh.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32A83EC9; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:07:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45E33E13.7010007@ru.mvista.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:07:47 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Atsushi Nemoto Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, jeff@garzik.org, michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com, pg@cs.stanford.edu, ahennessy@mvista.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: possible bug in net/tc35815.c in linux-2.6.19 References: <45E031A3.806@googlemail.com> <45E0B651.2050601@garzik.org> <20070226102659.GA28439@linux-mips.org> <20070226.200554.125898248.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20070226.200554.125898248.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14248 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Hello. Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > I know both MontaVista and CELF have new driver for the chip. If > anybody in MontaVista did not complain I can send CELF's one available > at http://tree.celinuxforum.org/pubwiki/moin.cgi/PatchArchive. (it Yeah, tc35815_1.c in our looks like the one in the CELF archive (what I didn't get is why they decided to keep both drivers around?) > needs some changes for recent kernel, for example pt_regs removal, but > it would be easy). > Sergei? I think everybody would be just thankful. :-) There's quite a lot of other TX4938 patches that need pushing into Linux/MIPS -- unfortunetely, this hasn't been done by MV... :-< > --- > Atsushi Nemoto BTW, does RBTX4938 boot the recent kernels for you? If so, what .config are you using -- I'm afraid something's up with rbhma4500_defconfig? WBR, Sergei