From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:53:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from webmail.ict.ac.cn ([159.226.39.7]:57823 "EHLO ict.ac.cn") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20021824AbXDRNxq (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:53:46 +0100 Received: (qmail 9809 invoked by uid 507); 18 Apr 2007 21:56:03 +0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (fxzhang@222.92.8.142) by ict.ac.cn with SMTP; 18 Apr 2007 21:56:03 +0800 Message-ID: <4626227E.4010703@ict.ac.cn> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:51:58 +0800 From: Fuxin Zhang User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: tiansm@lemote.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Fuxin Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/16] define Hit_Invalidate_I to Index_Invalidate_I for loongson2 References: <11766507651736-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507661317-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507661726-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507662638-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507661133-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507661526-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <11766507662650-git-send-email-tiansm@lemote.com> <20070418121139.GF3938@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20070418121139.GF3938@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 14879 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fxzhang@ict.ac.cn Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Yes, Loongson2 has no Hit_invalidate_I in fact. And although it has 4-way icache, one Index_invalidate_I will invalidate all 4 ways of the same set. The usermanual and datasheet can be downloaded from: http://www.lemote.com/upfiles/godson2e-user-manual-V0.6.pdf Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:25:55PM +0800, tiansm@lemote.com wrote: > > >> +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON2) >> +#define Hit_Invalidate_I 0x00 >> > > This #ifdef means Index_Invalidate_I and Hit_Invalidate_I will both be > defined as zero, is that really correct? > > (This is the point where I would really like to have a CPU manual ...) > > >> +#else >> #define Hit_Invalidate_I 0x10 >> +#endif >> > > Ralf > > > > >