From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 11 May 2007 20:59:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from proxima.lp0.eu ([85.158.45.36]:26811 "EHLO proxima.lp0.eu") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20021939AbXEKT73 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2007 20:59:29 +0100 Received: from redrum.lp0.eu ([2001:4b10:1005:0:202:44ff:fe50:91af]:54706 ident=byte) by proxima.lp0.eu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HmbDt-0000j5-OT; Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: <4644CA60.8080809@simon.arlott.org.uk> Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 20:56:16 +0100 From: Simon Arlott User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060819) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Arlott CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/mips/ References: <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4644C721.501@simon.arlott.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.2 OpenPGP: id=89C93563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15049 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: simon@fire.lp0.eu Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On 11/05/07 20:42, Simon Arlott wrote: > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c > index 1265358..b363604 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ > * return old_count; > * > * On machines without lld/scd we need a spinlock to make the > manipulation of > - * sem->count and sem->waking atomic. Scalability isn't an issue because > + * sem->count and sem->waking atomic. Scalibility isn't an issue because > * this lock is used on UP only so it's just an empty variable. > */ > static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr) I thought I'd reverted that mistake... it was correct already, too many "capability" fixes confusing me :/ -- Simon Arlott