From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:09:54 +0100 (BST) Received: from [222.92.8.141] ([222.92.8.141]:50048 "HELO lemote.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S20021356AbXFFFJw (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 06:09:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 2220 invoked by uid 511); 6 Jun 2007 05:16:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.233?) (192.168.2.233) by lemote.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2007 05:16:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4666418C.9040401@lemote.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:09:32 +0800 From: Tian User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: Kumba , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Mailing patches References: <20070604133551.GA24405@linux-mips.org> <4664DB12.80906@gentoo.org> <20070605152338.GA22937@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: <20070605152338.GA22937@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15278 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tiansm@lemote.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips sorry for the mess，when git-format-patch , wo forgot the -n para and i would like to know what command para is recommended for sending patch on maillist? git-send-email --no-chain-reply-to --compose --from tiansm@lemote.com --no-signed-off-by-cc --smtp-server --subject "Lemote Loongson 2E patch update" --suppress-from --to linux-mips@linux-mips.org 00* --no-chain-reply-to or --chain-reply-to ? and.....should i resend the patches? Tian Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:40:02PM -0400, Kumba wrote: > > >> What about just attaching the patches to a message? Seems like it'll avoid >> most of the problems Tbird has with them. I'm just not sure if that >> hampers importing them into git or not. >> > > There are issues if people have the log message in the attachment as > well. And of course there is still the prime reason why attachments > are a no-no - most mailers won't quote them so commenting on them is > hard when discussing things. > > Git has some limited abilities to handle MIME messages since quite a > while though. But quilt which is the heart of how I manage the queue > tree doesn't. > > Ralf > > > >