From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:26:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from [222.92.8.141] ([222.92.8.141]:2957 "HELO lemote.com") by ftp.linux-mips.org with SMTP id S20021471AbXFFH0F (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:26:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 24957 invoked by uid 511); 6 Jun 2007 07:32:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.233?) (192.168.2.233) by lemote.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2007 07:32:12 -0000 Message-ID: <4666613A.8090807@lemote.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:24:42 +0800 From: Tian User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Franck Bui-Huu CC: Ralf Baechle , Kumba , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Mailing patches References: <20070604133551.GA24405@linux-mips.org> <4664DB12.80906@gentoo.org> <20070605152338.GA22937@linux-mips.org> <4666418C.9040401@lemote.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 15297 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tiansm@lemote.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips thx for reply and would it be better if I use --thread when git-format-patch? Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > Hi, > > On 6/6/07, Tian wrote: >> >> --no-chain-reply-to or --chain-reply-to ? > > Usually "--no-chain-reply-to" is used and I think it's easier to > discuss on the patchset with this option. > >> >> and.....should i resend the patches? > > Does your patchset have order depedency ? if so, I think you should. >