From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:12:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479AA532.5040603@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080122154958.GA29108@linux-mips.org>
Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
> It's a cache instruction so priviledged which means userspace can't execute
> it. It's also entirely unclear if a cache barrier instruction would make a
> difference at all.
The cache barrier has an interesting effect. I built three binaries: f, f2, and
f3 (I'm cheap on the names):
f - cache barriers on load and stores (-mr10k-cache-barrier=2)
f2 - cache barriers on loads only (-mr10k-cache-barrier=1)
f3 - no cache barriers (flag omitted from gcc)
Running 'f' and 'f2' generates an "Illegal instruction" error, then drops back
to the command line, while 'f3' hangs the box. This is an IP28 running on
2.6.23.9, using Thomas' patches backported to fit (plus Peter's Impact code and
two sgiseeq patches from upstream).
This is similar to using a gentoo stage3 in a chroot environment that was built
back in May of 2007, so I think this hang up pre-dates glibc-2.7 by some degree,
as that chroot uses glibc-2.5. Chroot into this userland, and run our
"env-update" script, and you'll hang the box.
FYI, CPU rev in this machine is R10000 v2.5. I think that's the same for all
IP28 systems.
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands
do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-26 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-15 11:24 Tester with IP27/IP30 needed Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-01-15 11:27 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-01-17 0:40 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-01-17 8:27 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-01-17 10:00 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-01-17 15:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-19 19:12 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-01-17 11:59 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-22 15:20 ` Kumba
2008-01-22 15:49 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-26 3:12 ` Kumba [this message]
2008-01-26 14:39 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2008-02-02 22:08 ` Kumba
2008-02-03 2:16 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-02-03 6:27 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-02-05 7:11 ` Kumba
2008-02-05 12:22 ` Thiemo Seufer
2008-02-06 3:25 ` Kumba
2008-02-06 8:56 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-02-06 14:22 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-02-08 17:23 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-02-08 19:05 ` Thiemo Seufer
2008-02-08 19:29 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-02-07 5:30 ` Kumba
2008-02-05 15:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-23 8:47 ` peter fuerst
2008-01-15 13:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-15 13:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-15 18:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-16 16:03 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479AA532.5040603@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=debian-mips@lists.debian.org \
--cc=flo@rfc822.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox