From: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@cisco.com>
To: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Anyone noticed that there are a lot of cache flushes after kunmap/kunmap_atomic is called?
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:09:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489A5975.1000401@cisco.com> (raw)
On the MIPS processor, cache flushing is done based on virtual addresses.
However, in the Linux kernel, there are a lot of places where memory is mapped
with kmap or kmap_atomic, then unmapped with the corresponding kunmap or
kunmap_atomic and only *then* is the cache flushed. In other words, we only flush
the cache after we have dropped the mapping of memory into a virtual address. I
think this is generally wrong.
This may really only affect those of us who have enabled high memory, but it's
pretty prevalent in kernel code. We noted this before, but have apparently just
been bitten by it. Is it just me or is there a fairly widespread problem for
processors that flush the cache using virtual addresses?
- - - - - Cisco - - - - -
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The information is solely
intended for the named addressee (or a person responsible for delivering it to
the addressee). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are
not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any
part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your computer.
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-07 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-07 2:09 David VomLehn [this message]
2008-08-08 8:24 ` Anyone noticed that there are a lot of cache flushes after kunmap/kunmap_atomic is called? Ralf Baechle
2008-08-08 14:41 ` Jon Fraser
2008-08-11 23:19 ` David VomLehn
2008-08-12 0:49 ` Jon Fraser
2008-08-12 9:57 ` Kevin D. Kissell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489A5975.1000401@cisco.com \
--to=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox