From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:31:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:40868 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S24039960AbYLBBbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:31:13 +0000 Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id mB21UnuJ019279; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:30:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from realmbox11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.32] [10.29.19.32]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:30:52 +0900 Received: from [10.114.181.65] ([10.114.181.65] [10.114.181.65]) by mbox02.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:30:52 +0900 Message-Id: <49348FCC.1050404@necel.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:30:52 +0900 From: Shinya Kuribayashi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Daney CC: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Tomaso Paoletti Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Serial: UART driver changes for Cavium OCTEON. References: <492C94FC.9070906@caviumnetworks.com> <1227658719-18297-5-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <492F6525.9010308@necel.com> <4934303F.1000509@caviumnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <4934303F.1000509@caviumnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 21484 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips David Daney wrote: > ... All our boards are now working with no extra bug flags needed. So I > will simplify this patch set by getting rid of UART_BUG_TIMEOUT. Great! and makes sense. Thank you for taking care of my comments. I've also checked the serial patches of version 2, and they looks in good shape. -- Shinya Kuribayashi NEC Electronics