From: Marian Jancar <m.jancar@satca.net>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: gcc: mips32 vs mips3
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:21:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DA0FE3.1070400@satca.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090309193902.GA993@linux-mips.org>
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:55:10PM +0100, Marian Jancar wrote:
>
>> which option is supposed to compile faster code, -mips3 or -mips32?
>
> That question doesn't quite make sense. A MIPS32 processor can't execute
> MIPS III code and a MIPS III processor can't execute MIPS32 code. Only a
> MIPS64 processor could execute code compiled for either MIPS32 or MIPS III.
> So choose the option to match the architecture of your processor.
The processor in question is the processos in the Atheros 802.11 SoC
AR5312, 4Kc AFAIK.
OpenWRT uses -mips32 for this target but the GPL SDK for NanoStation
uses -march=r4600. Both options produce code that runs without oops
or any other immediately manifested issues.
So you are right, the correct question is "-mips32 vs -march=r4600".
I got confused because I left some bits compiled with -march=4600 when
recompiling with -mips32 and gcc complained about it being compiled
for MIPS III when linking.
Marian
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : Atheros AR2313
processor : 0
cpu model : MIPS 4Kc V0.10
BogoMIPS : 179.40
wait instruction : yes
microsecond timers : yes
tlb_entries : 16
extra interrupt vector : yes
hardware watchpoint : yes
ASEs implemented :
VCED exceptions : not available
VCEI exceptions : not available
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-06 16:55 gcc: mips32 vs mips3 Marian Jancar
2009-03-09 19:39 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-04-06 14:21 ` Marian Jancar [this message]
2009-04-06 14:30 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DA0FE3.1070400@satca.net \
--to=m.jancar@satca.net \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox