From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:16:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com ([12.108.191.235]:8397 "EHLO mail3.caviumnetworks.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1493171Ab0AYRQr (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:16:47 +0100 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.9]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,7,2,8378) id ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:16:24 -0800 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.9]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:15:22 -0800 Received: from dd1.caveonetworks.com ([12.108.191.236]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:15:22 -0800 Message-ID: <4B5DD1A9.6020306@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:15:21 -0800 From: David Daney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Anoop P.A." CC: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: 1 GB RAM with RM9000 SOC References: <4B56475F.8070608@gmail.com> <20100124002352.GB3251@linux-mips.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2010 17:15:22.0279 (UTC) FILETIME=[FA1B8370:01CA9DE1] X-archive-position: 25651 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 16080 Anoop P.A. wrote: > Hi list, > > > > Any of you successfully used >512MB ram with MIPS SOC's. Does Cavium Octeon count as a MIPS SOC? If so, then yes. I have many boards with both 2GB and 4GB. All of them Linux just fine when using all available RAM. > I have a > requirement where I have to use 1 GB ram with RM9000 based SOC. > > I have enabled 64 Bit support and so far it is working with 512 MB of > RAM. How ever if I increase memory beyond 512MB I am getting kernel > panic. > > > > I am adding memory region from 0x00 add_memory_region(0 ,0x40000000 , > BOOT_MEM_RAM). (PMON maps RAM from 0x0 to 0x40000000) Am I wrong here? > > > > It will be great if you can give some suggestion /point me to a working > implementation. I am using 2.6.18 kernel. > > > > Thanks > > Anoop > > > >