From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de ([134.100.9.70]:58108 "EHLO mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491048Ab0FTQtn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:43 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFA9866; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-hamburg.de Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HXcMxNgfQiih; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.37.30] (port-191.pppoe.wtnet.de [84.46.0.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: 7clausen) by mailhost.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBBF7865; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C1E467D.5030204@metafoo.de> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:49:01 +0200 From: Lars-Peter Clausen User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Bogendoerfer CC: Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Graham Gower Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] Add support for the Ingenic JZ4740 System-on-a-Chip References: <1276924111-11158-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20100620092610.GA4950@alpha.franken.de> <4C1E263E.1000903@metafoo.de> <20100620163437.GA8329@alpha.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20100620163437.GA8329@alpha.franken.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 27232 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: lars@metafoo.de Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Return-Path: X-Keywords: X-UID: 13818 Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >> Another issue with naming is that while a component might be similar in >> JZ4730 and JZ4740 it might be completely different in a different JZ47xx >> SoC. So naming a driver 'jz47xx_driver' instead of 'jz4740_driver' wont >> work either. >> > > so ? call it xx for the common part an exact number for special part. > It might be just jugglin with pieces, but getting it better in the first > run is always a plus. > > Thomas. > As I said, parts might be common between JZ4730 and JZ4740 but be different to JZ4750 and JZ4760. So JZ47xx wont fit either. Right now there is no practical use to moving things around, and there wont be until somebody who can actually test it starts adding support for a different JZ47XX SoC. - Lars