From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.39 on Cavium CN38xx
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:55:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF7928C.7010004@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110614033403.GA4582@ericsson.com>
On 06/13/2011 08:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:51:11PM -0400, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> [ ... ]
>>>>
>>>> The actual interrupt causing trouble and spurious interrupts in my case is,
>>>> oddly enough, STATUSF_IP0. So far I have been unable to track down how that
>>>> is triggered; I don't see the bit being set set in C0_CAUSE anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> Are there any means to trigger an IP0 interrupt other than by writing STATUSF_IP0
>>>> into the C0_CAUSE register ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No. Nothing that I know of ever uses IP0 and IP1, so they should always
>>> be cleared.
>>>
>> Exactly what I figured, yet I still get those spurious interrupts if IP0 is enabled.
>> Something odd is definitely going on in my system.
>>
>> Besides the above, my hopefully final problem is that timer interrupts are only
>> received by CPU 0. Any idea what to look for to fix this problem ?
>>
> Found the problem. Apparently the BIOS resets CvmCtl[IPTI] to 0.
That is clearly erroneous behavior. Although you can set any value, the
HRM clearly states that 2..7 are the only legal values.
The Cavuim/Octeon u-boot just leave it at the default value of 7, and
the kernel basically expects it to be 7, and never explicitly sets it.
We do set the IPPCI to 6 in the kernel, and for performance reasons,
expect it to have a different value than IPTI. IP{2,3,4} are basically
reserved for use by the system interrupt controller, so really these
things must be on one of IP{5,6,7}.
David Daney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 21:08 Linux 2.6.39 on Cavium CN38xx Guenter Roeck
2011-06-09 21:41 ` David Daney
2011-06-09 22:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-09 22:06 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-09 22:59 ` David Daney
2011-06-11 0:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-12 16:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-13 21:10 ` David Daney
2011-06-13 21:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-14 3:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-06-14 16:55 ` David Daney [this message]
2011-06-14 18:09 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF7928C.7010004@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox