From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary()
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:45:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8DD67E.3000600@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120417030848.GA6377@zhy>
On 04/16/2012 08:08 PM, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:48:14AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> On 04/16/2012 12:25 AM, Yong Zhang wrote:
>>> From: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@windriver.com>
>>>
>>> Too early to enable irq will break some following action,
>>> such as notify_cpu_starting().
>>
>> Can you be more specific about what breaks?
>
> For example:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> __cpu_up();
> mp_ops->boot_secondary();
> start_secondary();
> octeon_init_secondary();
> raw_local_irq_enable();
> <IRQ>
> do something;
> wake up softirqd;
> try_to_wake_up();
> select_fallback_rq();
> /* select wrong cpu */
> set_cpu_online();
>
Yeah, that looks broken to me too.
>>
>>>
>>> I don't get side effect with this patch.
>>
>> Without this, where do irqs get enabled on the secondary CPUs?
>
> cpu_idle() will handle it. But in fact we should not depend on
> cpu_idle().
It is not done in cpu_idle() itself. If irqs are disabled upon entry to
cpu_idle() *and* need_resched(), then we call into schedule(). The irqs
are then enabled by the raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock) at the end of
kernel/sched/core.c: __schedule().
>
> But it seems there is not suitable place to put local_irq_enable(),
> though ->smp_finish() looks like a more suitable place.
It would be better, but it seems like really it should be done in
cpu_idle() immediately after rcu_idle_enter().
>
> When looking more at smp support on MIPS, there is more things I find.
> Such as set_cpu_online() is called on CPU1, so there will be another race
> window like above scenario. Please take a look at what commit 2baab4e9
> intend to resolve.
>
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
>>> Cc: Ralf Baechle<ralf@linux-mips.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c | 1 -
>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
>>> index 97e7ce9..7e65c88 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/cavium-octeon/smp.c
>>> @@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit octeon_init_secondary(void)
>>> octeon_init_cvmcount();
>>>
>>> octeon_irq_setup_secondary();
>>> - raw_local_irq_enable();
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 7:25 [PATCH] MIPS: cavium: Don't enable irq in ->init__secondary() Yong Zhang
2012-04-16 16:48 ` David Daney
2012-04-17 3:08 ` Yong Zhang
2012-04-17 20:45 ` David Daney [this message]
2012-04-18 12:55 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8DD67E.3000600@gmail.com \
--to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox