From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
To: Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: [PATCH]: Improve atomic.h robustness
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:01:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE7B86E.7030601@gentoo.org> (raw)
I've maintained this patch, originally from Thiemo Seufer in 2004, for a
really long time, but I think it's time for it to get a look at for possible
inclusion. I have had no problems with it across various SGI systems over
the years.
To quote the post here:
http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-12/msg00000.html
"the atomic functions use so far memory references for the inline
assembler to access the semaphore. This can lead to additional
instructions in the ll/sc loop, because newer compilers don't
expand the memory reference any more but leave it to the assembler.
The appended patch uses registers instead, and makes the ll/sc
arguments more explicit. In some cases it will lead also to better
register scheduling because the register isn't bound to an output
any more."
Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
---
atomic.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff -Naurp a/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_add(int i,
" sc %0, %1 \n"
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
int temp;
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_add(int i,
" addu %0, %2 \n"
" sc %0, %1 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!temp));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_sub(int i,
" sc %0, %1 \n"
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
int temp;
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic_sub(int i,
" subu %0, %2 \n"
" sc %0, %1 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!temp));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -146,9 +146,8 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_add_return(
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" addu %0, %1, %3 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
int temp;
@@ -159,9 +158,8 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_add_return(
" addu %0, %1, %3 \n"
" sc %0, %2 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!result));
result = temp + i;
@@ -212,9 +210,8 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_sub_return(
" subu %0, %1, %3 \n"
" sc %0, %2 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!result));
result = temp - i;
@@ -262,7 +259,7 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_sub_if_posi
" .set reorder \n"
"1: \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
: "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
: "memory");
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
@@ -280,9 +277,8 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_sub_if_posi
" .set reorder \n"
"1: \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -430,8 +426,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic64_add(long
" scd %0, %1 \n"
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
long temp;
@@ -442,8 +438,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic64_add(long
" daddu %0, %2 \n"
" scd %0, %1 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!temp));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -473,8 +469,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic64_sub(long
" scd %0, %1 \n"
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
long temp;
@@ -485,8 +481,8 @@ static __inline__ void atomic64_sub(long
" dsubu %0, %2 \n"
" scd %0, %1 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter));
+ : "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} while (unlikely(!temp));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
@@ -517,9 +513,8 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_add_retu
" beqzl %0, 1b \n"
" daddu %0, %1, %3 \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else if (kernel_uses_llsc) {
long temp;
@@ -649,9 +644,8 @@ static __inline__ long atomic64_sub_if_p
" .set reorder \n"
"1: \n"
" .set mips0 \n"
- : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "=m" (v->counter)
- : "Ir" (i), "m" (v->counter)
- : "memory");
+ : "=&r" (result), "=&r" (temp), "+m" (v->counter)
+ : "Ir" (i));
} else {
unsigned long flags;
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 1:01 Joshua Kinard [this message]
2012-08-14 12:37 ` [PATCH]: Improve atomic.h robustness Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE7B86E.7030601@gentoo.org \
--to=kumba@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox