From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:19:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371566339-18336-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
On 06/18/2013 07:38 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
> some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
> do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
> commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
> is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
> with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
>
> After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
> the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
> we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
>
> Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
> notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
> and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
> the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
> As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
> related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
> rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
>
> Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT
> from asm files. MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there
> are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the
> __cpuinit macros.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
I get:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18640): Section mismatch in reference from
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18650): Section mismatch in reference from
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x24778): Section mismatch in reference from
the function start_secondary() to the function
.cpuinit.text:calibrate_delay()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit calibrate_delay().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of calibrate_delay is wrong.
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x247b4): Section mismatch in reference from
the function start_secondary() to the function
.cpuinit.text:notify_cpu_starting()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit notify_cpu_starting().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of notify_cpu_starting is wrong.
So I think an alternate approach is required.
Really I think we need to leave all existing __cpuinitdata and __cpuinit
annotations in place.
Instead we would first change the definitions of these two to be empyt:
#define __cpuinit
#define __cpuinitdata
Once that is working, we would make a second pass and remove the symbols
themselves.
David Daney
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 14:38 [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:54 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-19 22:19 ` David Daney [this message]
2013-06-20 0:28 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 0:28 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 2:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-20 13:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:55 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com \
--to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox