Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:19:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371566339-18336-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

On 06/18/2013 07:38 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
> some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
> do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
> commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
> is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
> with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
>
> After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
> the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
> we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
>
> Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
> notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
> and are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
> the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
> As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
> related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
> rid of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
>
> Here, we remove all the MIPS __cpuinit from C code and __CPUINIT
> from asm files.  MIPS is interesting in this respect, because there
> are also uasm users hiding behind their own renamed versions of the
> __cpuinit macros.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

I get:


WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18640): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable 
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x18650): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function register_cavium_notifier() to the variable 
.cpuinit.data:octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045
The function register_cavium_notifier() references
the variable __cpuinitdata octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045.
This is often because register_cavium_notifier lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of octeon_cpu_callback_nb.37045 is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x24778): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function start_secondary() to the function 
.cpuinit.text:calibrate_delay()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit calibrate_delay().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of calibrate_delay is wrong.

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x247b4): Section mismatch in reference from 
the function start_secondary() to the function 
.cpuinit.text:notify_cpu_starting()
The function start_secondary() references
the function __cpuinit notify_cpu_starting().
This is often because start_secondary lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of notify_cpu_starting is wrong.



So I think an alternate approach is required.

Really I think we need to leave all existing __cpuinitdata and __cpuinit 
annotations in place.

Instead we would first change the definitions of these two to be empyt:

#define __cpuinit
#define __cpuinitdata

Once that is working, we would make a second pass and remove the symbols 
themselves.

David Daney

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 14:38 [PATCH v2] mips: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from MIPS code Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:38 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-18 14:54 ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-19 22:19 ` David Daney [this message]
2013-06-20  0:28   ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20  0:28     ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20  2:15     ` Ralf Baechle
2013-06-20 13:38       ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:38         ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-06-20 13:55         ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C22E75.3020001@gmail.com \
    --to=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox